Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
Published on: June 20, 2018
Factors Affecting the Surgical Outcome in Nasal Septal Perforation Repair
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Objective:
Nasal septal perforation (NSP) repair is challenging surgery considered in patients with symptomatic NSP intractable to conservative treatments. This study aimed to assess the success rate and identify factors affecting the surgical outcome of NSP by analyzing consecutive series of NSP repairs by a single surgeon.
Methods:
We enrolled 84 patients diagnosed with NSP and who underwent surgical repair of NSP by a single surgeon (Y.J.J.) between November 2007 and July 2022. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed regarding variables involving preoperative symptoms, rhinologic history, etiology, surgical techniques, and the outcome of surgery. In addition, features of NSP were objectively evaluated using computed tomography scans.
Results:
The overall success rate of NSP repair was 64.3% (54 of 84). Nasal obstruction (79.8%), crusting (34.5%), and epistaxis (27.4%) were frequent preoperative symptoms. Iatrogenic injury from previous nasal surgery (70.2%) was the most common cause. The average size of NSP on preoperative CT was 9.53 ± 6.68 mm. Patients with incomplete NSP closure had significantly larger perforations (12.21 ± 7.92 mm) than those with successful closure (8.04 ± 5.41 mm) preoperatively (P = .005). Patients with smoking history (OR = 2.971, 95% CI 1.170-7.548, P = .020) and NSP repair with combined rhinoplasty (OR = 3.811, 95% CI 1.401-10.370, P = .007) were more likely to experience incomplete closure. Patients whose perforations were reinforced with interposition graft were more likely to result in successful repair (OR = 6.752, 95% CI 2.496-18.262, P < .001). The bilaterality of mucosal flap coverage, surgical approach, types of mucosal flap and interposition graft, perforation shape, mucosal thickness around perforation, and distance from the nasal floor were not significantly related to the surgical outcome.
Conclusions:
Significant factors affecting the outcome of NSP repair were patient's smoking status, combined rhinoplasty, application of interposition graft, and perforation size.
Related Concept Videos
Epistaxis
Etiology
Possible causes of this condition include high blood pressure, trauma, low humidity, upper respiratory tract infections, allergies, foreign bodies, nasal inhalation of corticosteroids or illicit drugs, excessive use of decongestant nasal sprays, facial or nasal surgery, anatomic malformation, tumors, or systemic...
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Suctioning the Nasopharyngeal Airway
Equipment Required
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus....

