Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Analyzing Large Protein Complexes by Structural Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 19, 2010
Top-Down Analysis of Supercharged Proteins Using Collision-, Electron-, and Photon-Based Activation Methods.
Kyle J Juetten1, Jennifer S Brodbelt1
1Department of Chemistry, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States.
Supercharging proteins impacts fragmentation patterns differently across activation methods. While some methods decrease sequence coverage, others like UVPD and EThcD maintain or improve it, enhancing cleavage site identification.
Area of Science:
- Proteomics
- Mass Spectrometry
- Biochemistry
Background:
- Supercharging increases protein charge states, potentially altering fragmentation behavior in mass spectrometry.
- Understanding these changes is crucial for optimizing protein analysis and sequence coverage.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of supercharging on protein fragmentation patterns using various activation methods.
- To evaluate changes in sequence coverage and preferential cleavage sites under different activation conditions.
Main Methods:
- Six model proteins were analyzed using five activation methods: Higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD), Electron Transfer Dissociation (ETD), Electron Transfer Higher-energy Collisional Dissociation (EThcD), 213 nm Ultraviolet Photodissociation (UVPD), and 193 nm UVPD.
- Proteins were analyzed under both non-supercharged and supercharged conditions.
- Fragmentation patterns, sequence coverage, and cleavage site preferences were evaluated.
Main Results:
- Supercharging led to significant decreases in sequence coverage with HCD, but modest gains with ETD.
- EThcD, 213 nm UVPD, and 193 nm UVPD showed minimal changes in sequence coverage, generally yielding the highest coverages.
- Preferential backbone cleavage sites were enhanced across all methods, especially with HCD, 213 nm UVPD, and 193 nm UVPD.
- Supercharging consistently introduced new backbone cleavage sites for ETD, EThcD, 213 nm UVPD, and 193 nm UVPD.
Conclusions:
- The effect of supercharging on protein fragmentation is highly dependent on the activation method used.
- UVPD and EThcD are robust methods for maintaining high sequence coverage even with supercharged proteins.
- Supercharging can enhance the identification of specific cleavage sites, aiding in detailed proteomic analysis.
More Related Videos
10:05Large-scale Top-down Proteomics Using Capillary Zone Electrophoresis Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Published on: October 24, 2018
09:30Analyzing Dynamic Protein Complexes Assembled On and Released From Biolayer Interferometry Biosensor Using Mass Spectrometry and Electron Microscopy
Published on: August 6, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Peptide Identification Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry
This technique helps gather information regarding the protein from which the peptide was obtained and to study the peptides’ amino acid sequence. Identifying peptides from a complex mixture is an important component of the growing field of...
Protein Dynamics in Living Cells
Fluorescent recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is a fluorescent-protein-based detection technique used to quantify protein movement rates within the cell. This method exposes a small portion of the cell to an intense laser beam. The laser beam causes permanent photobleaching of the fluorophore-tagged proteins in the exposed region. As the bleached...