Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2025

A Full Skin Defect Model to Evaluate Vascularization of Biomaterials In Vivo
Published on: August 28, 2014
Thrombosis and myocardial infarction: the role of bioresorbable scaffolds
Massoud A Leesar1, Marc D Feldman2
1Division of Cardiology University of Alabama, Birmingham.
Insights
Drug-eluting stents (DES) reduce restenosis but very late stent thrombosis remains a challenge. Fully bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) aim to overcome limitations, but early BRS showed higher thrombosis rates than DES.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular medicine
- Biomaterials science
- Interventional cardiology
Background:
- Coronary stents significantly improved coronary artery stenosis treatment.
- In-stent restenosis (ISR) and stent thrombosis (ST) remain critical challenges.
- Drug-eluting stents (DES) reduced ISR but very late ST persists despite dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).
Purpose of the Study:
- To review mechanisms of failure in fully bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS).
- To provide insights into optimizing BRS deployment using intravascular imaging.
- To discuss future perspectives for next-generation BRS.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of BRS technology and outcomes.
- Analysis of mechanisms contributing to BRS failure.
- Discussion of intravascular imaging for BRS deployment optimization.
Main Results:
- Early BRS experienced higher thrombosis rates compared to DES.
- Mechanisms of BRS failure include strut fractures, loss of vessel compliance, and neoatherosclerosis.
- Intravascular imaging can guide optimal BRS implantation.
Conclusions:
- Next-generation BRS with thinner struts, novel designs, and alternative materials are needed.
- Optimizing BRS deployment is crucial for improving patient outcomes.
- Further research is essential to enhance the safety and efficacy of BRS technology.
Abstract:
Coronary stents have dramatically improved the treatment of coronary artery stenosis. In-stent-restenosis (ISR) and stent thrombosis (ST) pose major obstacles to the success of coronary stenting. Drug-eluting stents (DES) emerged as a major breakthrough in stenting and significantly reduced ISR. Despite taking dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), very late ST has remained a major obstacle in the success of DES. This occurs regardless of the type of polymer or antiproliferative agent in the contemporary stents. Such adverse events occur at a rate of approximately 2% to 3% per year after first year, which have been attributed to the strut fractures, loss of vessel compliance and vasomotion, and neoatherosclerosis. Fully bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) have emerged in an effort to overcome these limitations leading to a "leave nothing behind" approach. While appealing, the initial experience with BRS technology was hampered by increased rates of BRS thrombosis compared with DES. In this review, we summarized underlying mechanisms leading to BRS failure and provided insights into optimizing BRS deployment with intravascular imaging. In addition, we outlined the perspectives of new generations BRS with thinner struts and new designs as well as alternative materials to improve outcome.
Related Concept Videos
Clot Retraction and Fibrinolysis
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins

