Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment
Published on: May 7, 2019
A comprehensive taxonomy on multimedia video forgery detection techniques: challenges and novel trends
Walid El-Shafai1,2, Mona A Fouda2, El-Sayed M El-Rabaie2
1Security Engineering Lab, Computer Science Department, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, 11586 Saudi Arabia.
Abstract:
Thousands of videos are posted on websites and social media every day, including Twitter, Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, and YouTube. Newspapers, law enforcement publications, criminal investigations, surveillance systems, Banking, the museum, the military, imaging in medicine, insurance claims, and consumer photography are just a few examples of places where important visual data may be obtained. Thus, the emergence of powerful processing tools that can be easily made available online poses a huge threat to the authenticity of videos. Therefore, it's vital to distinguish between true and fake data. Digital video forgery detection techniques are used to validate and check the realness of digital video content. Deep learning algorithms lately sparked a lot of interest in the field of digital forensics, such as Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (DCNN), and Adaptive Neural Networks (ANN). In this paper, we give a soft taxonomy as well as a thorough overview of recent research on multimedia falsification detection systems. First, the basic knowledge needed to comprehend video forgery is provided. Then, a summary of active and passive video manipulation detection approaches is provided. Anti-forensics, compression video methods, datasets required for video forensics, and challenges of video detection approaches are also addressed. Following that, we presented an overview of deepfake, and the datasets required for detection were also provided. Also, helpful software packages and forensics tools for video detection are covered. In addition, this paper provides an overview of video analysis tools that are used in video forensic applications. Finally, we highlight research difficulties as well as interesting research avenues. In short, this survey provides detailed information and a broader investigation to extract data and detect fraud video contents under one umbrella.
More Related Videos
08:13SwarmSight: Real-time Tracking of Insect Antenna Movements and Proboscis Extension Reflex Using a Common Preparation and Conventional Hardware
Published on: December 25, 2017
09:49Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
Published on: December 24, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Extraction: Advanced Methods
Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods
In the visual method, metal-ion indicators (metallochromic dyes), which have distinct colors in their free and complex forms, are added to the mixture to signal the titration's end point. They form stable complexes with metal ions, but these complexes are weaker than the corresponding metal–EDTA complexes. As a...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...