Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting among patients with left ventricular
Vikash Jaiswal1,2, Song Peng Ang3, Abhigan Babu Shrestha4
1JCCR Cardiology Research, Varanasi.
Insights
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is superior to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with ischemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). CABG reduces risks of mortality, repeat procedures, and myocardial infarction in LVSD patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Current guidelines support coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) over medical therapy.
- Optimal revascularization strategy for patients with ischemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) remains under investigation.
- Limited data exists comparing CABG and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in LVSD patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare clinical outcomes of PCI versus CABG in patients with LVSD.
- To determine the optimal revascularization strategy for LVSD patients based on existing literature.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search conducted on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Libraries until November 2022.
- Meta-analysis of 10 studies including 13,324 patients with LVSD.
- Outcomes reported as pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using STATA.
Main Results:
- PCI group showed higher odds of all-cause mortality (OR 1.15, P=0.03), repeat revascularization (OR 3.57, P<0.001), and myocardial infarction (MI) (OR 1.92, P=0.048) compared to CABG.
- Incidence of cardiovascular mortality, stroke, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, and ventricular tachycardia were comparable between PCI and CABG.
- Mean follow-up duration was 3.75 years; common comorbidities included hypertension and diabetes mellitus.
Conclusions:
- Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) demonstrates superiority over percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD).
- CABG is associated with significantly lower risks of all-cause mortality, repeat revascularization, and myocardial infarction in LVSD patients.
- The findings support CABG as the preferred revascularization strategy for patients with LVSD.
Abstract:
Current guidelines have shown the superiority of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) over medical therapy. However, there is a paucity of data evaluating the optimal revascularization strategy in patients with ischemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD).
Objective:
The authors aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of postpercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and CABG among patients with LVSD.
Methods:
The authors performed a systematic literature search using the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Libraries for relevant articles from inception until 30 November 2022. Outcomes were reported as pooled odds ratio (OR), and their corresponding 95% CI using STATA (version 17.0, StataCorp).
Results:
A total of 10 studies with 13 324 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age of patients in PCI was 65.3 years, and 64.1 years in the CABG group. The most common comorbidities included: HTN (80 vs. 78%) and DM (49.2 vs. 49%). The mean follow-up duration was 3.75 years. Compared with CABG, the PCI group had higher odds of all-cause mortality (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.01-1.31, P=0.03), repeat revascularization (OR 3.57, 95% CI 2.56-4.97, P<0.001), MI (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.01-3.86, P=0.048) while the incidence of cardiovascular mortality (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.98-1.55, P=0.07), stroke (OR 0.73 95% CI: 0.51-1.04, P=0.08), major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.99-1.87, P=0.06), and ventricular tachycardia (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.22-2.86, P=0.72) was comparable between both the procedures.
Conclusion:
The results of this meta-analysis suggest that CABG is superior to PCI for patients with LVSD. CABG was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality, repeat revascularization, and incidence of myocardial infarction compared with PCI in patients with LVSD.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care


