Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2025

08:53
Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
Published on: June 6, 2025
401
Evaluation of the Uniform Data Set version 3 teleneuropsychological measures
Theresa F Gierzynski1, Allyson Gregoire1, Jonathan M Reader1
1Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Summary
The in-home National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) Uniform Data Set version 3 tele-adapted test battery (UDS v3.0 t-cog) shows moderate to good reliability for assessing cognition. However, its reliability is slightly lower than traditional in-person assessments.
Area of Science:
- Neuropsychology
- Gerontology
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Teleneuropsychology (teleNP) assessments are increasingly important for remote cognitive evaluations.
- Few studies have explored in-home teleNP, and none have specifically evaluated the NACC Uniform Data Set version 3 tele-adapted test battery (UDS v3.0 t-cog).
- This study addresses the need to understand the reliability of the UDS v3.0 t-cog in an in-home setting.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the reliability of the in-home UDS v3.0 t-cog.
- To compare the reliability of the tele-adapted battery with prior in-person UDS v3.0 evaluations.
- To determine if the UDS v3.0 t-cog is a viable alternative to in-person assessments.
Main Methods:
- 181 participants (cognitively unimpaired or impaired) from a longitudinal aging study underwent both in-person and in-home UDS v3.0 evaluations approximately 16 months apart.
- In-home evaluations were administered via video conference (n=122) or telephone (n=59).
- Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to assess agreement between the in-person and tele-adapted assessments.
Main Results:
- Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the UDS v3.0 t-cog ranged from 0.01 to 0.79, indicating moderate to good agreement for most tests.
- Reliability remained comparable for participants with stable diagnoses.
- However, ICCs were generally stronger for repeated in-person UDS v3.0 evaluations (Range: 0.35-0.87).
Conclusions:
- The UDS v3.0 t-cog appears to be a potentially viable alternative to in-person neuropsychological assessments.
- Reliability of the tele-adapted battery may be somewhat attenuated compared to traditional in-person methods.
- Further controlled research is necessary to definitively establish the reliability of these remote cognitive measures.

