Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2025

A Rat Model of Pressure Overload Induced Moderate Remodeling and Systolic Dysfunction as Opposed to Overt Systolic Heart Failure
Published on: April 30, 2020
Effect of insulin resistance on left ventricular remodelling in essential hypertensives: a cross-sectional study
Bernard Kianu Phanzu1, Aliocha Nkodila Natuhoyila2, Eleuthère Kintoki Vita3
1Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Kinshasa Hospital, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo; Centre Médical de Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Insights
Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia impact left ventricular hypertrophy differently. Insulin resistance affects left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, while hyperinsulinaemia impacts posterior wall thickness, both contributing to diastolic dysfunction.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Endocrinology
- Internal Medicine
Background:
- Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is clinically assessed using imperfect physical and electrocardiographic criteria.
- Echocardiography defines LVH by left ventricular mass, calculated using Devereux's formula, which is influenced by insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia.
- The distinct roles of insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia in LVH development and diastolic dysfunction remain unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the associations of insulin resistance (using homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance - HOMAIR) and fasting plasma insulin levels with Devereux's formula components and left ventricular diastolic function parameters.
- To elucidate the specific contributions of insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia to left ventricular geometry and diastolic function in hypertensive patients.
Main Methods:
- Collected clinical data from 220 hypertensive patients.
- Utilized logistic regression models to test associations between insulin resistance markers (HOMAIR, fasting insulin) and Devereux's formula components and diastolic function parameters.
Main Results:
- Insulin level and HOMAIR explained 46.8% of interventricular septum diameter variation and 30.9% of E-wave deceleration time variation.
- HOMAIR alone explained 30.1% of left ventricular end-diastolic diameter variation.
- Insulin level alone explained 46.3% of posterior wall thickness and 29.4% of relative wall thickness variation.
Conclusions:
- Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia exert differential effects on left ventricular hypertrophy components.
- Insulin resistance influences left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, while hyperinsulinaemia affects posterior wall thickness.
- Both insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia contribute to interventricular septum changes and diastolic dysfunction.
Background:
In clinical practice, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is defined by physical findings and electrocardiographic criteria, which are useful but imperfect tools, echocardiographic criteria and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. In echocardiography, LVH is defined not by left ventricular wall thicknesses but by left ventricular mass. The latter is calculated according to Devereux's formula, and is increased by insulin resistance/hyperinsulinaemia. It is however unclear whether insulin resistance, hyperinsulinaemia, or both, is actually causative and what their collective or individual influence is on the components of Devereux's formula and parameters of left ventricular diastolic function. This study evaluated the associations of the homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMAIR) and fasting plasma insulin levels with components of Devereux's formula and parameters of left ventricular diastolic function.
Methods:
Relevant clinical data were collected from 220 hypertensive patients recruited between January and December 2019. The associations of components of Devereux's formula and parameters of diastolic function with insulin resistance were tested using binary ordinal, conditional and classical logistic regression models.
Results:
Thirty-two (14.5%) patients (43.9 ± 9.1 years), 99 (45%) patients (52.4 ± 8.7 years) and 89 (40.5%) patients (53.1 ± 9.8 years) had normal left ventricular geometry, concentric left ventricular remodelling and concentric left ventricular hypertrophy, respectively. In multivariable adjusted analysis, 46.8% of variation in interventricular septum diameter (R² = 0.468; overall p = 0.001) and 30.9% of E-wave deceleration time (R² = 0.309; overall p = 0.003) were explained by insulin level and HOMAIR, 30.1% of variation in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (R² = 0.301; p = 0.013) by HOMAIR alone, and 46.3% of posterior wall thickness (R² = 0.463; p = 0.002) and 29.4% of relative wall thickness (R² = 0.294; p = 0.007) by insulin level alone.
Conclusions:
Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia did not have the same influence on the components of Devereux's formula. Insulin resistance appeared to act on left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, while hyperinsulinaemia affected the posterior wall thickness. Both abnormalities acted on the interventricular septum and contributed to diastolic dysfunction via the E-wave deceleration time.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Heart Failure V: Medical Management

