Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
Published on: February 6, 2015
Driving Diversity and Inclusion in Cancer Drug Development - Industry and Regulatory Perspectives, Current Practices,
Lola A Fashoyin-Aje1, Craig Tendler2, Bea Lavery3
1FDA Oncology Center of Excellence, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Abstract:
In April 2022, the FDA issued draft guidance to help industry develop strategies to improve diversity in clinical trials. Historically, clinical trial sponsors have not systematically incorporated efforts to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), particularly during the early design stages of clinical development plans and operational strategies. Unfortunately, a retrospective approach to DEI often results in clinical trial participants not being reflective of the diversity of patients intended to be treated with new therapies. A shift to prospective, intentional DEI strategies for clinical trials, including long-term engagement with diverse patients and communities throughout the development life cycle, is necessary to maximize the benefits and minimize the risks of new drugs and devices for all patients. Sponsors' current practices and opportunities for improving DEI address four major topics: institutional commitment, culture change, and governance; clinical development strategy; setting enrollment goals to ensure trial participant diversity; and development and implementation of the operational strategy. As DEI practices gain wider adoption in clinical trials, shared learning and collaboration among stakeholders on an ongoing and noncompetitive basis will lead to sustainable change. Prioritization of enrollment of diverse populations as an integral part of study start-up planning, clinical trial design, and recruitment capabilities will enhance the clinical development process for oncology therapies. Importantly, these efforts will help provide equitable access to clinical trials and innovative cancer therapies.
Insights
Implementing prospective diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) strategies in clinical trials is crucial. This ensures new therapies benefit all patients by making trial participants reflective of the diverse populations intended for treatment.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trial Design and Operations
- Health Equity and Inclusion
- Drug Development and Regulatory Science
Background:
- Historically, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) have not been systematically integrated into early clinical trial design.
- A retrospective approach to DEI results in clinical trial populations not reflecting the diversity of patients who will use new therapies.
- This lack of diversity can lead to suboptimal benefits and risks for underrepresented patient groups.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline strategies for improving diversity in clinical trials, as per FDA draft guidance.
- To advocate for a shift from retrospective to prospective, intentional DEI strategies throughout the drug development lifecycle.
- To highlight the importance of DEI for maximizing therapeutic benefits and minimizing risks across all patient populations.
Main Methods:
- Review of FDA draft guidance on improving diversity in clinical trials.
- Analysis of current sponsor practices and opportunities for enhancing DEI.
- Focus on four key areas: institutional commitment, clinical development strategy, enrollment goals, and operational strategy.
Main Results:
- Sponsors' current DEI efforts are being evaluated across institutional, strategic, and operational domains.
- Prospective DEI strategies require long-term engagement with diverse patients and communities.
- Shared learning and collaboration among stakeholders are essential for sustainable DEI adoption.
Conclusions:
- A prospective and intentional approach to DEI is necessary for equitable clinical trial outcomes.
- Prioritizing diverse population enrollment in study planning, design, and recruitment enhances drug development, particularly for oncology therapies.
- Implementing robust DEI strategies ensures equitable access to innovative therapies for all patients.
More Related Videos
10:24Generation of Heterogeneous Drug Gradients Across Cancer Populations on a Microfluidic Evolution Accelerator for Real-Time Observation
Published on: September 19, 2019
10:03Physiologic Patient Derived 3D Spheroids for Anti-neoplastic Drug Screening to Target Cancer Stem Cells
Published on: July 5, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Drug Regulation
Clinical Trials: Overview
Drug Discovery: Overview
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact