Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla
Published on: February 19, 2021
Comparison of vestibular schwannoma visualization between 0.55 T and 1.5 T MRI
Marco Wiesmueller1, Markus Kopp1, Matti Sievert2
1Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Objectives:
Vestibular schwannoma (VS) is the most common mass of the internal auditory canal (IAC) and is responsible for unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1.5 T and 3 T is the standard of care for the evaluation of VS, and the feasibility of using modern low-field MRI for imaging of the IAC has not yet been elucidated. Hence, the purpose of this prospective study was to assess image quality and diagnostic performance of a modern 0.55 T MRI.
Materials And Methods:
Fifty-six patients with known unilateral VS underwent routine MRI of the IAC at 1.5 T, followed immediately by 0.55 T MRI. Two radiologists independently evaluated the image quality, conspicuity of VS, diagnostic confidence, and image artifacts separately for isotropic T2-weighted SPACE images and for transversal and coronal T1-weighted fat-saturated contrast-enhanced images at 1.5 T and 0.55 T using 5-point Likert scales. In a second independent reading, both readers assessed lesion conspicuity and subjective diagnostic confidence in a direct comparison of 1.5 T and 0.55 T images.
Results:
Image quality of transversal T1-weighted images (p = 0.13 and p = 0.16 for Reader 1 and Reader 2, respectively) and T2-weighted SPACE images (p = 0.39 and p = 0.58) were rated equally at 1.5 T and 0.55 T by both readers, whereas image quality of coronal T1-weighted images was superior at 1.5 T (p = 0.009 and p = 0.001). Analysis of the conspicuity of VS, diagnostic confidence, and image artifacts of all sequences revealed no significant differences between 1.5 T and 0.55 T. In the direct comparison of 1.5 T with 0.55 T images, there were no significant differences in lesion conspicuity or diagnostic confidence for any sequence (p = 0.60-0.73).
Conclusions:
Modern low-field MRI at 0.55 T provided a sufficient diagnostic image quality and seems feasible for the evaluation of VS of the IAC.
More Related Videos
10:25Author Spotlight: Integrating High-Resolution Intravital Imaging and MRI to Enhance Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Planning
Published on: April 12, 2024
08:57Measuring the Influence of Magnetic Vestibular Stimulation on Nystagmus, Self-Motion Perception, and Cognitive Performance in a 7T MRT
Published on: March 3, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...