Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Intracoronary Acetylcholine Provocation Testing for Assessment of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders
Published on: August 18, 2016
Impact of preceding acetylcholine provocation testing on following coronary physiological assessment during an
Tatsuro Yamazaki1, Yuichi Saito1, Daichi Yamashita1
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Insights
The order of diagnostic tests for ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) matters. Preceding acetylcholine (ACh) provocation can alter subsequent coronary physiological assessment results, especially if the ACh test is positive.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Diagnostic Procedures
Background:
- Ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) requires accurate diagnosis.
- Intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) provocation and coronary physiological assessment are key diagnostic tools for INOCA.
- The optimal sequence of these diagnostic procedures remains debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of performing the intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) provocation test before coronary physiological assessment.
- To compare coronary physiological indices based on the sequence and outcome of the ACh test in patients with suspected INOCA.
Main Methods:
- 120 patients with suspected INOCA underwent invasive coronary physiological assessment.
- Patients were divided into groups based on whether ACh provocation preceded the assessment (ACh group) or not (no ACh group).
- The ACh group was further stratified into positive and negative ACh test results.
Main Results:
- Fractional flow reserve was lower in the no ACh group compared to the ACh group.
- Resting mean transit time was significantly longer in the positive ACh group (1.22 ± 0.55s), followed by the no ACh (1.00 ± 0.46s) and negative ACh (0.74 ± 0.36s) groups (p < 0.001).
- Index of microcirculatory resistance and coronary flow reserve showed no significant differences across groups.
Conclusions:
- The sequence of diagnostic procedures impacts coronary physiological assessment findings in INOCA evaluation.
- A positive acetylcholine provocation test significantly influences subsequent physiological measurements.
- Further research is needed to establish the definitive order for INOCA diagnostic procedures.
Background:
Intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) provocation test and coronary physiological assessment are useful interventional diagnostic procedures for evaluating ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA). However, the appropriate sequential order of the diagnostic procedures has been a matter of debate. We investigated the impact of preceding ACh provocation on following coronary physiological assessment.
Methods:
Patients suspected of INOCA underwent invasive coronary physiological assessment using thermodilution method and were divided into two groups according to the implementation of ACh provocation test. The ACh group was further divided into the positive and negative ACh groups. In the ACh group, intracoronary ACh provocation was performed before the invasive coronary physiological assessment. The main interest of this study was to compare coronary physiological indices among the no ACh, negative ACh, and positive ACh groups.
Results:
Of 120 patients, the no ACh, and negative and positive ACh groups included 46 (38.3 %), 36 (30.0 %), and 38 (31.7 %), respectively. Fractional flow reserve was lower in the no ACh group than in the ACh group. Resting mean transit time was significantly longer in the positive ACh group, followed by the no ACh and negative ACh groups (1.22 ± 0.55 vs. 1.00 ± 0.46 vs. 0.74 ± 0.36 s, p < 0.001). Index of microcirculatory resistance and coronary flow reserve did not differ significantly among the three groups.
Conclusions:
Preceding ACh provocation influenced following physiological assessment, particularly when ACh test was positive. Further studies are warranted to determine which interventional diagnostic procedure, ACh provocation or physiological assessment, should be preceded in the invasive evaluation of INOCA.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Myasthenia Gravis: Diagnostic Tests
The edrophonium test is a diagnostic tool for myasthenia gravis. It involves...
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care

