Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Physiology Lab Demonstration: Glomerular Filtration Rate in a Rat
Published on: July 26, 2015
Effect of Two Cystatin C Reagents and Four Equations on Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimations After Standardization
Hyun-Seung Lee1, Go-Eun Bae2, Jung Eun Lee3
1Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Korea.
Insights
Serum cystatin C (cysC) measurements show variability, especially at low concentrations, impacting estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculations. Different reagent and equation combinations yield inconsistent eGFR results, highlighting standardization challenges.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Biomarker Analysis
- Renal Function Assessment
Background:
- Serum cystatin C (cysC) is a reliable biomarker for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), less influenced by factors like sex and muscle mass compared to creatinine.
- Standardization of cysC measurements faces challenges despite available certified reference materials.
- The impact of combining different cysC reagents and eGFR equations remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the concordance of cysC measurements between two standardized reagents (Gentiancys and Rochecys).
- To assess the variability in eGFR estimations generated by combining these cysC measurements with four different equations (CKD-EPIcys, CAPAeq, FASeq, EKFCcys).
Main Methods:
- A simulation analysis was performed on cysC measurements from 148 participants using Gentiancys and Rochecys reagents.
- eGFR was calculated using eight combinations of two cysC measurement results and four distinct equations.
- Statistical analyses included regression and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient to assess agreement.
Main Results:
- Mean cysC levels were comparable between Gentiancys (1.72±1.44 mg/L) and Rochecys (1.71±1.35 mg/L).
- Reagent concordance was observed within 0.85-4.40 mg/L under a ±7.61% total allowable error.
- Lin's concordance correlation coefficient for eGFR varied significantly (0.73 to 1.00) depending on the reagent-equation combination.
Conclusions:
- Equivalence of cysC values between the two reagents was unsatisfactory at low concentrations (<0.85 mg/L).
- Different measurement systems and equation combinations can lead to substantial variations in calculated eGFR.
- These findings underscore the need for improved standardization in cysC assays for accurate eGFR determination.
Background:
Serum cystatin C (cysC), which is less affected by sex, race, and muscle mass than creatinine, is a useful biomarker of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The standardization of cysC measurements remains controversial, although a certified reference material (ERM-DA471/IFCC) is available. Moreover, the effect of combinations of cysC reagents and equations for eGFR is unclear.
Methods:
We conducted a simulation analysis of cysC measured using two reagents standardized against ERM-DA471/IFCC-Gentian cystatin C immunoassay (Gentiancys; GentianAS, Moss, Norway) and Roche Tina-quant Cystatin C Gen.2 (Rochecys; Roche, Mannheim, Germany)-on a Cobas c702 system (Roche) and eGFR generated by eight combinations of four equations: 2012 cystatin C-based Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPIcys); the Caucasian, Asian, pediatric, and adult equation (CAPAeq); full age spectrum equation (FASeq); and 2023 cystatin C-based European Kidney Function Consortium equation (EKFCcys).
Results:
A total of 148 participants (mean age, 60.5±14.5 years; 43% female) were enrolled. The mean cysC was 1.72±1.44 mg/L for Gentiancys and 1.71±1.35 mg/L for Rochecys. Regression analysis showed concordance between the reagents within 0.85-4.40 mg/L when using ±7.61% total allowable error. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient of eGFR, by combining the measuring system and equation, varied from 0.73 to 1.00.
Conclusions:
The equivalence of cysC values at low concentrations (<0.85 mg/L) between the two reagents was unsatisfactory. Results obtained with different measurement systems could lead to larger differences in eGFR varying with the combination.
Related Concept Videos
Renal Clearance
Renal clearance refers to the volume of plasma cleared of a specific substance, such as creatinine, per unit of time. To measure clearance, urine samples are collected over a 24-hour period during each bladder voiding, followed by a single blood sample at the...
Renal Drug Excretion: Glomerular Filtration
Drugs gain access to the kidney via the renal artery, which progressively branches off into afferent arterioles....
Factors Affecting Renal Clearance: Renal Impairment
One condition associated with renal failure is uremia. Uremia is characterized by impaired glomerular filtration and fluid accumulation in the body. This condition hinders the renal clearance of drugs, resulting in drug accumulation and potential...
Glomerular Filtration Rate and its Regulation
GFR regulation involves two primary intrinsic controls: the myogenic and tubuloglomerular feedback mechanisms.
The myogenic...
Renal Drug Clearance: Comparison Between Renal Excretion Methods
Renal clearance is often associated with the renal glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which represents the rate at which plasma is filtered through the glomeruli in the kidney. When drug reabsorption is minimal and there is no active secretion, renal clearance is closely related to the...
Serum Studies: Renal Function Tests

