A Meta-Analysis on Comparison of Open vs Closed Reduction of Gartland Type 3 Supracondylar Humerus Fractures in

S Barik1, V Garg2, S K Sinha2

  • 1Department of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Jharkhand, India.

Insights

Closed reduction offers better functional outcomes for Type 3 Gartland supracondylar humerus fractures compared to open reduction. Cosmetic outcomes and complication rates were similar between both surgical interventions.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Pediatric orthopedics
  • Traumatology

Background:

  • Type 3 Gartland supracondylar humerus fractures require careful management.
  • Optimal surgical approach (open vs. closed reduction) remains debated.
  • Understanding outcomes and complications is crucial for treatment decisions.

Approach:

  • Systematic literature search of Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library.
  • Data extraction on study details, demographics, procedures, and outcomes (Flynn criteria).
  • Pooled data analysis and comparison of open versus closed reduction techniques.

Key Points:

  • No significant difference in cosmetic outcomes between open and closed reduction.
  • Closed reduction demonstrated statistically better functional outcomes (RR 0.92).
  • Overall complication rates and nerve injury incidence were comparable for both methods.

Conclusions:

  • Closed reduction with percutaneous fixation yields superior functional outcomes for Type 3 Gartland fractures.
  • Open reduction with K-wire fixation does not offer advantages in functional or cosmetic results.
  • A high threshold for converting closed to open reduction is recommended in pediatric cases.