B-mode shear wave elastography can be an alternative method to vibration-controlled transient elastography according...

We aimed to compare vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) with shear wave elastography (SWE) without previous analysis and generate regression equations between VCTE and new point SWE using combination-elastography.

Overall, 829 patients with chronic liver disease were enrolled in this study. Patients with a skin-liver capsule distance > 25 mm were excluded. The reproducibility of VCTE and SWE was confirmed in a phantom study and a clinical study. Considering that combination-elastography allows measurement based on strain elastography, a similar analysis was performed for the liver fibrosis index (LFI), which is a quantitative value for evaluation of liver fibrosis calculated using strain elastography image features. Regression equations between the VCTE and SWE values were obtained based on linear regression analysis.

In the phantom study and clinical study, there was a strong correlation between VCTE and SWE [r = 0.995 (p < 0.001) and r = 0.747 (p < 0.001), respectively). The regression equation between VCTE and SWE was VCTE (kPa) = 1.09 × point SWE (kPa) - 0.17. The Bland-Altman plots revealed no statistically significant bias. Meanwhile, there was no correlation between VCTE and LFI (r = 0.279). There was a statistically significant bias between VCTE and LFI in the Bland-Altman plots. The inter-operator reliability showed a good intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.760 (95% confidence interval: 0.720-0.779).

Liver stiffness measured using point SWE was comparable to that measured using VCTE.