Acting locally, thinking nationally: layering Indigenous ontology within wellbeing frameworks
Kate Harriden1, Eunice Yu2, Mandy Yap3
1Monash Institute of Sustainable Development, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Fenner School of Environment & Society, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT; k.harriden@monash.edu.
Abstract:
There are hundreds of sovereign nations covering the modern nation-state of Australia.1 Noting the inadequacy of many contemporary terms to encompass Indigenous ontology, Indigenous nations have long practised what is now being expressed as 'wellbeing frameworks' in many nation-states. Unlike the sentiment expressed in contemporary wellbeing frameworks, Country - the complex web of relationships between the human and other-than-human that underpins everything2 - and relationality are fundamental to Indigenous 'wellbeing'. The philosophy of mabu liyan (good feeling), intrinsic to the Yawuru nation of North Western Australia, is only one example of Indigenous governance where Country-centred planning and relational wellbeing are 'business as usual'. Layering elements that are critical to Indigenous expressions of wellbeing, specifically Country and relationality, when developing wellbeing frameworks would broaden and deepen contemporary approaches to wellbeing while accommodating differences at the local scale.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Dimensions of Health and Illness
Concepts of Health and Illness
Traits, Mood, and Subjective Wellbeing
Neuroticism and...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Biodiversity and Human Values
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison


