Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2025

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
Active Iterative Social Inference in Multi-Trial Signaling Games.
Asya Achimova1,2, Gregory Scontras3, Ella Eisemann4
1Research Training Group 1808 "Ambiguity: Production and Perception", University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Participants partially succeeded in inferring choice priors in complex learning scenarios. Active task engagement and reasoning transparency significantly improved strategic choices and prior inference accuracy in signaling games.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Science
- Behavioral Economics
- Game Theory
Background:
- Human decision-making reveals factors influencing choices.
- Speakers can infer listeners' choice priors from observed ambiguity resolution.
- Previous studies show limited strategic construction of ambiguous situations for learning.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate prior inference in complex learning scenarios.
- Examine information accumulation across trials.
- Assess the impact of active scenario construction on prior inference.
Main Methods:
- Signaling games were used to study referential ambiguity.
- Experiment 1: Assessed evidence accumulation over four trials.
- Experiment 2: Evaluated active scenario construction and iterative settings.
Main Results:
- Information integration for prior inference was only partially successful.
- Integration errors included transitivity failure and recency bias.
- Full task engagement and reasoning transparency enhanced optimal choices and prior inference.
Conclusions:
- Complex learning scenarios pose challenges for accurate prior inference.
- Active participation and transparent reasoning pipelines are crucial for strategic decision-making.
- Improved inference accuracy and strategic utterance choices result from deeper engagement.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Hindsight Biases
Social Exchange Theory

