Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2025

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
Multi-response Mendelian randomization: Identification of shared and distinct exposures for multimorbidity and
Verena Zuber1, Alex Lewin2, Michael G Levin3
1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; MRC Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; UK Dementia Research Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Abstract:
The existing framework of Mendelian randomization (MR) infers the causal effect of one or multiple exposures on one single outcome. It is not designed to jointly model multiple outcomes, as would be necessary to detect causes of more than one outcome and would be relevant to model multimorbidity or other related disease outcomes. Here, we introduce multi-response Mendelian randomization (MR2), an MR method specifically designed for multiple outcomes to identify exposures that cause more than one outcome or, conversely, exposures that exert their effect on distinct responses. MR2 uses a sparse Bayesian Gaussian copula regression framework to detect causal effects while estimating the residual correlation between summary-level outcomes, i.e., the correlation that cannot be explained by the exposures, and vice versa. We show both theoretically and in a comprehensive simulation study how unmeasured shared pleiotropy induces residual correlation between outcomes irrespective of sample overlap. We also reveal how non-genetic factors that affect more than one outcome contribute to their correlation. We demonstrate that by accounting for residual correlation, MR2 has higher power to detect shared exposures causing more than one outcome. It also provides more accurate causal effect estimates than existing methods that ignore the dependence between related responses. Finally, we illustrate how MR2 detects shared and distinct causal exposures for five cardiovascular diseases in two applications considering cardiometabolic and lipidomic exposures and uncovers residual correlation between summary-level outcomes reflecting known relationships between cardiovascular diseases.
Insights
Multi-response Mendelian randomization (MR2) identifies exposures causing multiple outcomes by modeling residual correlations. This advanced method enhances power and accuracy for detecting shared causal factors in complex diseases.
Area of Science:
- Genetics and Epidemiology
- Statistical Genetics
- Causal Inference
Background:
- Mendelian randomization (MR) traditionally models one exposure and one outcome.
- Existing MR methods are not designed for joint analysis of multiple outcomes, limiting studies of multimorbidity.
- Identifying shared causal exposures across related diseases requires methods that can handle multiple responses.
Purpose of the Study:
- Introduce multi-response Mendelian randomization (MR2), a novel framework for multiple outcomes.
- Enable the identification of exposures causing one or more outcomes.
- Estimate residual correlations between outcomes and detect shared or distinct causal exposures.
Main Methods:
- Utilize a sparse Bayesian Gaussian copula regression framework.
- Jointly model multiple outcomes to detect causal effects.
- Estimate residual correlation between summary-level outcomes, accounting for shared pleiotropy and non-genetic factors.
Main Results:
- MR2 demonstrates higher power to detect shared exposures causing multiple outcomes compared to existing methods.
- MR2 provides more accurate causal effect estimates by accounting for outcome dependence.
- Uncovers residual correlations between outcomes, reflecting known disease relationships, as shown in cardiovascular disease applications.
Conclusions:
- MR2 is a powerful new tool for investigating shared and distinct causal exposures across multiple related outcomes.
- The method improves causal inference in complex diseases and multimorbidity studies.
- Accounting for residual correlation is crucial for accurate causal discovery in multi-outcome analyses.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
08:51Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts
Published on: September 20, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...