Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2025

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
The Influence of Hospital Site on Emergency Physician Press Ganey Scores
Dietrich Jehle1, Brian Doherty2, Lexus Dickson3
1University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.
Background:
The use of physician satisfaction scores to evaluate emergency medicine physicians' performance and compensation is controversial. Prior studies have shown that the clinical environment may influence scores. This study compared satisfaction scores for the same physician at different emergency departments (ED). Differences in their individual score may indicate the ED environment could be as important as the physician's interaction.
Methods:
Press Ganey satisfaction scores were obtained for physicians at three EDs-Grand Strand, South Strand and North Strand-between July 2018 and June 2019. Included physicians worked at all 3 facilities and had at least 6 patient satisfaction surveys at each site. The Press Ganey scale ranges from 1-5, with 1 as "very poor" and 5 as "very good". Using top-box methodology, the total physician score was generated from the average of 4 questions: courtesy, keeping patients informed, patient comfort and listening. We utilized descriptive statistics to compare scores for all physicians at each of the 3 sites. In addition, each physician's top box scores were averaged by site for analysis (two-way ANOVA) to determine if individual physician scores varied in different EDs.
Results:
Fourteen physicians met inclusion criteria. Physicians at the main ED had an average total score of 73.37 ± 6.08 (SD) versus 76.5 ± 8.87 and 85.09 ± 7.75 at the 2 free standing EDs. Two-way ANOVA showed that the Press Ganey scores were significantly different for individual physicians between the newer free-standing ED and either the main ED or the other free-standing ED, p<0.001 and p=0.014, respectively. The observed difference between the main ED and the older free-standing ED was not statistically significant, p=0.111. When applying the same analysis to the 4 individual physician questions, the significant differences or trends persisted.
Conclusion:
Physician satisfaction scores demonstrated a significant variance depending on where they practiced. The highest patient satisfaction scores were received at the newest of the 3 facilities with individual rooms. The findings suggest that Press Ganey scores may not be reliable when comparing patient satisfaction scores for providers who practice in different EDs.
More Related Videos
09:52Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Hospitals-II
Nurses that work in...
Hospitals-I
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Methods of Documentation VII: EMR
Sites for measruring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.