Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2025

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
Published on: June 12, 2019
A Randomized, Open Label, Exploratory Trial Comparing Efficacy of Amantadine and Ropinirole in Restless Legs Syndrome
Govind Madhaw1, Ravi Gupta2,3, Puneet Dhamija4
1Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Abstract:
Objective Amantadine has both anti-glutamatergic and dopaminergic action and may improve restless legs syndrome (RLS). We compared the efficacy and adverse-effect profile of amantadine and ropinirole in RLS. Methods In this randomized, open-label, 12-week flexible-dose exploratory study, RLS patients with international RLS study group severity scale score (IRLSS) > 10 were randomized to receive either amantadine(100-300mg/day) or ropinirole (0.5-2mg/day). Drug dose was increased until week-6 if IRLSS failed to improve by ≥10% of previous visit score. IRLSS change from baseline at week-12 was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included change in RLS-related quality of life (RLS-QOL) and insomnia severity index (ISI), along with clinical-global-impression of change/improvement (CGI-I), and proportion of patients with adverse-effects and resulting discontinuation. Results Twenty-four patients received amantadine and 22 received ropinirole. Both groups had a significant effect for visit*treatment arm (F (2.19,68.15) =4.35;P = 0.01). With a similar baseline IRLSS, both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol analyses revealed comparable IRLSS until week-8, with ropinirole appearing superior from week-10 to week-12 (week-12 IRLSS, amantadine vs ropinirole:17.0 ± 5.7 vs 9.0 ± 4.4;P < 0.001). ITT analysis at week-12 showed comparable proportion of responders (≥10% IRLSS reduction) in both groups (P = 0.10). Both drugs improved sleep and QOL, but week-12 scores favoured ropinirole [(ISI:14.4 ± 5.7 vs 9.4 ± 4.5; P = 0.001) ;(RLS-QOL:70.4 ± 17.9 vs 86.5 ± 9.8; P = 0.005)]. CGI-I at week-12 favoured ropinirole (Mann-Whitney U = 35.50, S. E = 23.05;P = 0.01). Four patients in amantadine and two in ropinirole group developed adverse effects, with resulting discontinuation in two patients on amantadine. Conclusions The present study reports equivalent reduction in RLS symptoms with both amantadine and ropinirole until week-8, with the latter being superior from week-10 onwards. Ropinirole was better tolerated.
More Related Videos
03:53Author Spotlight: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery in Postamputation Pain Management
Published on: March 15, 2024
06:18Assessing the Autonomic and Behavioral Effects of Passive Motion in Rats using Elevator Vertical Motion and Ferris-Wheel Rotation
Published on: February 7, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Restless Leg Syndrome and Night Terrors
The exact cause of RLS is not fully understood, but it is believed to involve dopamine, a neurotransmitter that helps regulate muscle movement. Imbalances in dopamine levels...
Peripherally and Centrally Acting Muscle Relaxants: A Comparison
Centrally acting muscle relaxants can be further divided into spasmolytic and antispasmodic drugs. Spasmolytic...
Parkinson's Disease: Treatment
Parkinson's Disease is primarily a result of the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta. The cornerstone of...