Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Phase-lead and Phase-lag Controllers01:22

Phase-lead and Phase-lag Controllers

201
Understanding the working function of different types of controllers can be illustrated with practical analogies, such as adjusting a stereo's volume equalizer. Cranking up the bass involves a phase-lead controller, which functions as a high-pass filter, while increasing the treble uses a phase-lag controller, which acts as a low-pass filter. PD controllers, similar to high-pass filters, enhance the system's response to high-frequency components. PI controllers, akin to low-pass...
201
Gain01:15

Gain

202
Gain and phase shift are properties of linear circuits that describe the effect a circuit has on a sinusoidal input voltage or current. The circuit's behavior that contains reactive elements will depend on the frequency of the input sinusoid. As a result, it is observed that the gain and phase shift will all be frequency functions.
Gain:
Suppose Vin is the input and Vout is the output signal to a circuit.
202
Interference: Path Lengths01:10

Interference: Path Lengths

1.3K
Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
1.3K
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lag Control01:21

Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lag Control

120
Phase-lag controllers are widely used in control systems to improve stability and reduce steady-state errors. A dimmer switch controlling the brightness of a light bulb serves as a practical example of phase-lag control, gradually adjusting the bulb's brightness. Mathematically, phase-lag control or low-pass filtering is represented when the factor 'a' is less than 1.
Phase-lag controllers do not place a pole at zero, but instead influence the steady-state error by amplifying any...
120

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Very Early Cortical Auditory Responses to Speech in Humans.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Neural and Behavioral Changes in Older Adults from Auditory-Cognitive Training.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same author

The Impacts of Two Adaptive Auditory-Cognitive Training Paradigms on Listening to Competing Talkers.

Seminars in hearing·2025
Same author

Neural and Behavioral Changes in Older Adults from Auditory-Cognitive Training.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

ATM-dependent DNA damage response constrains cell growth and drives clonal hematopoiesis in telomere biology disorders.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2025
Same author

Increased listening effort and decreased speech discrimination at high presentation sound levels in acoustic hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same journal

Cultural Differences in Listening Environments Between Hispanic and White Non-Hispanic Cochlear Implant Users.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Detection of Inner Ear Malformations Based on Simple Anatomical Measurements: A Model Approach.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Avoiding Cisplatin-Related Hearing Loss, Including Implementing Sodium Thiosulfate as Otoprotectant Into Daily Pediatric Clinical Practice: Proceedings Based on Evidence and Expert Opinion From the Ototoxicity Taskforce of the SIOP Supportive Care Network.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Quantifying Miscommunications in Triadic Conversations: Effects of Hearing Impairment, Hearing Aids, and Background Noise.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Weeklong Noise Exposure of 100 College Students Who Participate in Music Activities.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Cortical Auditory Neural Responses to Speech and Communicative Functioning in Normocephalic Children With Prenatal Exposure to the Zika Virus.

Ear and hearing·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Neuro-rehabilitation Approach for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss
09:44

Neuro-rehabilitation Approach for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Published on: January 25, 2016

19.3K

Hearing Aid Delay Effects on Neural Phase Locking.

Mary Zhou1, Roksana Soleimanpour2, Aakriti Mahajan2

  • 1Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.

Ear and Hearing
|July 12, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Shorter hearing aid delays improve neural processing of sound envelopes by minimizing comb-filter effects. This study found that delays of 0.5 msec enhanced neural phase locking more than longer delays.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation
03:49

Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation

Published on: October 11, 2024

850
Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
10:50

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Published on: June 6, 2012

14.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Neuro-rehabilitation Approach for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss
09:44

Neuro-rehabilitation Approach for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Published on: January 25, 2016

19.3K
Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation
03:49

Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation

Published on: October 11, 2024

850
Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
10:50

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Published on: June 6, 2012

14.6K

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Speech Processing
  • Hearing Aid Technology

Background:

  • Hearing aid processing delays can impact the neural representation of sound.
  • The comb-filter effect is a potential mechanism disrupting neural phase locking.
  • Understanding these effects is crucial for optimizing hearing aid performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of varying hearing aid processing delays on neural temporal envelope representation.
  • To determine if shorter delays minimize the comb-filter effect and improve neural phase locking.

Main Methods:

  • Twenty-one older adults with mild-to-moderate hearing loss participated.
  • Hearing aids with processing delays of 0.5, 5, and 7 msec were used.
  • Envelope-following responses (EFRs) were recorded, and phase-locking factor (PLF) and stimulus-to-response (STR) correlations were calculated.

Main Results:

  • A 0.5-msec delay resulted in significantly higher PLF and STR correlations compared to 5-msec and 7-msec delays.
  • No significant difference was found between 5-msec and 7-msec delays.
  • Individuals with milder hearing loss showed a greater difference in neural processing based on delay.

Conclusions:

  • Hearing aid processing delays disrupt neural phase locking, particularly with open-fit domes.
  • Reducing hearing aid delay is recommended for improved speech-in-noise perception.
  • Future hearing aid algorithm design should prioritize minimizing processing delays.