Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing by Stimulated Raman Scattering Imaging of Deuterium Incorporation in a Single Bacterium
Published on: February 14, 2022
Less Is More: When to Repeat Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
Maarten J Sarink1, Lonneke G M Bode1, Peter Croughs1
1Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Antimicrobial resistance in common bacteria like E. coli and S. aureus changes slowly. For many infections, repeat susceptibility testing within 7 days may not be necessary, saving resources and reducing waste.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Antimicrobial Resistance
Background:
- Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns can change over time within the same patient.
- Monitoring these changes is crucial for effective treatment and infection control.
- The frequency and predictability of resistance development require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the frequency of changes in antimicrobial susceptibility patterns for common bacterial pathogens.
- To evaluate the risk of developing resistance over different follow-up periods.
- To assess the feasibility of omitting routine follow-up antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 18,501 antimicrobial susceptibility tests (AST) from January 2014 to December 2021.
- Focus on Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus.
- Utilized Vitek 2 system, determining essential and categorical agreement, and introducing new metrics for resistance changes.
Main Results:
- Staphylococcus aureus showed a <10% risk of resistance within 30 days.
- Enterobacterales exhibited approximately 10% risk of resistance within 7 days.
- Pseudomonas aeruginosa demonstrated a higher risk of resistance with longer follow-up periods; specific drug-bug combinations (e.g., E. coli/amoxicillin-clavulanic acid) were more prone to resistance.
Conclusions:
- A follow-up AST risk below 10% suggests omitting repeat testing within 7 days may be feasible for certain bacteria.
- This approach could lead to significant cost, time, and laboratory waste savings.
- Further research is needed to balance economic benefits against the risk of suboptimal antibiotic treatment.
More Related Videos
09:59Application of the Intelligent High-Throughput Antimicrobial Sensitivity Testing/Phage Screening System and Lar Index of Antimicrobial Resistance
Published on: July 21, 2023
08:30One-day Workflow Scheme for Bacterial Pathogen Detection and Antimicrobial Resistance Testing from Blood Cultures
Published on: July 9, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test
Antimicrobial Effectiveness