Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

32.0K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
32.0K
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

34.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.8K
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

14.8K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.8K
Mechanical Efficiency of Real Machines01:14

Mechanical Efficiency of Real Machines

760
The mechanical efficiency of a machine is a fundamental concept that describes how effectively a machine can convert input work into output work. According to this concept, the efficiency of a machine is equal to the ratio of the output work to the input work. An ideal machine, meaning a machine that has no energy losses, has an efficiency of one. This implies that the input work and the output work are equal.
However, in reality, no machine can be truly ideal, and all of them experience some...
760
Machines01:19

Machines

305
Machines are complex structures consisting of movable, pin-connected multi-force members that work together to transmit forces. One example of a machine is the cutting plier, which is used to cut wires by applying forces to its handles. When equal and opposite forces are exerted on the handles of the cutting plier, they cause the cutting edges to come together and apply equal and opposite reaction forces on the wire, which are greater than the applied forces.
A free-body diagram of the...
305
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Low prevalence targets are primarily missed due to mind wandering.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

Self-Multimerization of mRNA LNP-Derived Antigen Improves Antibody Responses.

Vaccines·2026
Same author

Comprehensive self-antigen screening to assess cross-reactivity in promiscuous T-cell receptors.

Frontiers in immunology·2026
Same author

Identification of novel DNA sequence motifs that modulate transcription in T cells.

BMC genomics·2026
Same author

Hierarchical Bayesian estimation for cognitive models using Particle Metropolis within Gibbs (PMwG): A tutorial.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

Dividing up the pie: Allocating attention across dual tasks.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025
Same journal

Limits to Language Prediction: Findings From Diverse Populations.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

There Is More Than Meets the Eye: The Dual Role of Perception in Shaping Color Lexicons.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Inference and Imagination.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Gesture Use Across Different Concepts: Focusing on Cross-Linguistic Diversity.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Exploring Amazonian Cognitive Diversity at Chana Research Station.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Do (We Think That) Plants Have Agency?

Topics in cognitive science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

8.0K

Human Performance in Competitive and Collaborative Human-Machine Teams.

Murray S Bennett1,2, Laiton Hedley1, Jonathon Love1

  • 1School of Psychology, The University of Newcastle.

Topics in Cognitive Science
|July 13, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Human-machine teams show performance costs, especially in competitive settings. Collaboration reduces these costs in human teams but less so when partnered with AI, impacting team efficiency.

Keywords:
CollaborationCompetitionGroup performanceHuman–AI teamingWorkload capacity

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.4K
One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
14:05

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence

Published on: December 15, 2010

27.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

8.0K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.4K
One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
14:05

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence

Published on: December 15, 2010

27.0K

Area of Science:

  • Human-computer interaction
  • Team performance analysis
  • Artificial intelligence in teams

Background:

  • Complex tasks necessitate teamwork for improved performance and error reduction.
  • Traditionally human-only teams now integrate artificial intelligence (AI) and machine systems.
  • Understanding human-machine team dynamics is crucial for optimizing collaborative efforts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and compare the performance of human-human and human-machine teams.
  • To analyze the impact of different group conditions (collaboration, competition, independence) on team performance.
  • To adapt and apply workload capacity analysis to assess human-machine team efficiency.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a computerized task modeled after an arcade game for performance evaluation.
  • Manipulated group conditions: collaborative, competitive, and independent work.
  • Compared gameplay performance and analyzed behavioral patterns across team types and conditions.

Main Results:

  • Both human-human and human-machine teams experienced performance efficiency costs across all conditions.
  • Collaborative human-human teams showed reduced costs compared to competitive teams.
  • This benefit of collaboration was diminished in human-machine pairings, indicating unique team dynamics.

Conclusions:

  • Workload capacity analysis is a valuable tool for measuring human-machine team performance.
  • Teamwork dynamics differ significantly between human-human and human-machine collaborations.
  • Optimizing AI integration requires careful consideration of team structures and conditions to mitigate performance costs.