Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Social Capital and Pets in Retirement Villages.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2026
Same author

Parental Identity and Subjective Well-Being in Older Women: The Moderating Role of the Human-Dog Bond.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Companion Dogs in Vietnam: Exploring Characteristics of Owned and Ideal Dogs.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2026
Same author

The Cat Is Already Out of the Bag: Humane and Pragmatic Solutions for Cats on Dairy Farms. Reply to Calver et al. It's Premature to Encourage Working Cats for Rodent Control on Australian Dairy Farms.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2026
Same author

The Influence of Cat Coat Colour, Eye Shape, and Pupil Size on Ratings of Adoptability Based on a Standardised Online Image, in an Australian Sample.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2026
Same author

Development and Evaluation of the Veterinary Nurse Burnout Prevention Survey (VNBPS).

Veterinary sciences·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Automated, Long-term Behavioral Assay for Cognitive Functions in Multiple Genetic Models of Alzheimer's Disease, Using IntelliCage
06:46

Automated, Long-term Behavioral Assay for Cognitive Functions in Multiple Genetic Models of Alzheimer's Disease, Using IntelliCage

Published on: August 4, 2018

12.2K

Can Interacting with Animals Improve Executive Functions? A Systematic Review.

Deanna Tepper1, Joanna Shnookal1, Tiffani Howell1

  • 1School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bendigo, VIC 3550, Australia.

Animals : an Open Access Journal From MDPI
|July 14, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Human-animal interactions show potential for improving executive functions, but research quality varies. More rigorous studies are needed to confirm benefits for cognitive planning and self-regulation.

Keywords:
adolescenceanimal-assisted serviceschildrencognitiondevelopmenthuman–animal relationshiphuman–pet relationshipolder adults

More Related Videos

Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice
07:38

Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice

Published on: September 20, 2024

1.1K
Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

2.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Automated, Long-term Behavioral Assay for Cognitive Functions in Multiple Genetic Models of Alzheimer's Disease, Using IntelliCage
06:46

Automated, Long-term Behavioral Assay for Cognitive Functions in Multiple Genetic Models of Alzheimer's Disease, Using IntelliCage

Published on: August 4, 2018

12.2K
Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice
07:38

Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice

Published on: September 20, 2024

1.1K
Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

2.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human-Animal Interaction Studies

Background:

  • Growing interest in human-animal interactions (HAIs) for enhancing executive functions (EFs).
  • Executive functions encompass planning, problem-solving, and self-regulation.
  • A comprehensive review of existing literature was lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically evaluate the existing literature on the relationship between human-animal interactions and executive functions.
  • To identify common research approaches and findings in this field.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
  • Inclusion of 16 peer-reviewed papers and 7 grey literature sources (6 dissertations, 1 thesis).
  • Analysis of studies exploring human-pet relationships, animal presence during EF tests, and animal-assisted services for EFs.

Main Results:

  • Five studies reported significant EF improvements, though effect sizes were often underreported.
  • Nine studies yielded mixed findings (d = 0.32-0.55), and eight found no significant results.
  • Research demonstrated significant heterogeneity in methodologies and outcome measures, limiting overall rigor.

Conclusions:

  • Human-animal interactions show a potential, albeit inconsistent, impact on executive functions.
  • Current research quality is limited by methodological variability.
  • Future research should prioritize high-quality methodologies, including randomization and appropriate control groups, to strengthen evidence.