Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2025

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Colorectal cancer treatment guidelines and shared decision making quality and reporting assessment: Systematic review
Marta Maes-Carballo1, Yolanda Gómez-Fandiño2, Manuel García-García3
1Department of General Surgery, Breast Cancer Unit, Complexo Hospitalario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain; Hospital Público de Verín, Ourense, Spain; Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Granada, Spain; University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Introduction:
Physicians must share decisions and choose personalised treatments regarding patients´ beliefs and values.
Objective:
To analyse the quality of the recommendations about shared decision making (SDM) in colorectal (CRC) and anal cancer treatment clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and consensus statements (CSs).
Methods:
Guidelines were systematically reviewed following prospective registration (Prospero: CRD42021286146) without language restrictions searching 15 databases and 59 professional society websites from January 2010 to November 2021. A validated 31-item SDM quality assessment tool was employed to extract data in duplicate.
Results:
We identified 134 guidelines. Only 46/134 (34.3 %) mentioned SDM. Fifteen (11.1 %) made clear, precise and actionable recommendations, while 9/134 (6.7 %) indicated the strength of the SDM-related recommendations. CPGs underpinned by systematic reviews reported SDM more often than those based on consensus or reviews (35.9 % vs 32.0 %; p = 0.031). Guidelines that reported following quality tools (i.e., AGREE II) more commonly commented about SDM than when it was not reported (75.0 % vs 32.0 %; p = 0.003).
Conclusion And Practice Implications:
Most of the CRC and anal treatment guidelines did not mention SDM and it was superficial. Guidelines based on systematic reviews and those using quality tools demonstrated better reporting of SDM. Recommendations about SDM in these guidelines merit urgent improvement.
More Related Videos
12:45Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2022
03:44Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists
Published on: July 11, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Standards of Care II
Standards of Care I
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...