Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gas Chromatography: Introduction01:13

Gas Chromatography: Introduction

2.1K
Gas chromatography (GC) is a technique for separating and analyzing volatile compounds in a sample. Its primary purpose is to identify and quantify components in complex mixtures, making it essential in fields such as environmental analysis, pharmaceuticals, and petrochemicals. GC is also called vapor-phase chromatography (VPC) or gas-liquid partition chromatography (GLPC).
In GC,  a sample is vaporized and mixed with an inert carrier gas (the mobile phase), which transports it through a...
2.1K
Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)01:14

Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)

4.4K
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) is the combination of analytical techniques of gas chromatography and mass spectrometry in a single instrument for analyzing a mixture of compounds. The gas chromatograph separates the compounds in the mixture, and the mass spectrometer analyzes each compound separately to determine the molecular masses and molecular structures.
A gas chromatograph consists of a long, narrow capillary column with a polysiloxane coating on the inner wall....
4.4K
Gas Chromatography: Types of Columns and Stationary Phases01:17

Gas Chromatography: Types of Columns and Stationary Phases

734
Gas chromatography (GC) relies on stationary phases to separate and analyze components in a sample. There are two main types of stationary phases: liquid and solid. Liquid stationary phases are non-volatile, thermally stable, and chemically inert liquids coated onto the column. Solid stationary phases are particles of adsorbent material, such as silica gel or molecular sieves.
For an analyte to remain on the column for a sufficient amount of time, it must exhibit some level of compatibility (or...
734
Types Of Column Chromatography01:29

Types Of Column Chromatography

11.3K
The stability and compatibility of column material with samples are crucial for efficient purification in chromatographic techniques. Various operating parameters such as pH, temperature, or solvent affect the packing of the column material, thereby determining the purification efficiency. The choice of column material also plays an essential role in deciding the operating parameters and can be modified based on the proteins that need to be purified.
Gel Filtration Chromatography
When the...
11.3K
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors01:13

Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors

634
Detectors in gas chromatography (GC) help identify and quantify the components of a mixture by translating chemical properties into measurable signals, which are displayed on a chromatogram. Detectors can be categorized into two main types: destructive and non-destructive.
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
634
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

424
In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...
424

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An <i>In Situ</i>, Automated High-Explosives Aging Method Utilizing Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry.

ACS omega·2025
Same author

Energetic Materials as Matrices for MALDI-TOFMS Analysis of High-Molecular-Weight Polyvinylidene Fluoride-<i>co</i>-chlorotrifluoroethylene.

Analytical chemistry·2025
Same author

Use of Fisher's Ratio assisted multivariate curve resolution- alternating least squares for discovery-based analysis using ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry.

Journal of chromatography. A·2025
Same author

Discovery-Based Analysis for Chemical Trends in Chromatographic Data Sets Using Alteration Analysis and Two-Dimensional Correlation Analysis.

Analytical chemistry·2025
Same author

Development of a Gas Chromatography with High-Resolution Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Methodology for BDNPA/F.

ACS omega·2023
Same author

Radiolytic degradation of dodecane substituted with common energetic functional groups.

RSC advances·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography
10:14

Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography

Published on: September 2, 2020

5.0K

Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography under low-pressure conditions.

Michelle A Corbally1, Nicholas S Hinz2, Chris E Freye1

  • 1High Explosives Science and Technology, Q-5, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.

Journal of Chromatography. A
|July 14, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Low-pressure comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) enables faster analysis of challenging compounds by eluting them at lower temperatures. While peak capacity was reduced, peak capacity production remained comparable, offering an efficient alternative for complex sample analysis.

Keywords:
Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC)Low-pressure GCMass SpectrometryThermally labile

More Related Videos

Qualitative Characterization of the Aqueous Fraction from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algae Using 2D Gas Chromatography with Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry
11:44

Qualitative Characterization of the Aqueous Fraction from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algae Using 2D Gas Chromatography with Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry

Published on: March 6, 2016

9.4K
On-line Analysis of Nitrogen Containing Compounds in Complex Hydrocarbon Matrixes
07:49

On-line Analysis of Nitrogen Containing Compounds in Complex Hydrocarbon Matrixes

Published on: August 5, 2016

10.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography
10:14

Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography

Published on: September 2, 2020

5.0K
Qualitative Characterization of the Aqueous Fraction from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algae Using 2D Gas Chromatography with Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry
11:44

Qualitative Characterization of the Aqueous Fraction from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algae Using 2D Gas Chromatography with Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry

Published on: March 6, 2016

9.4K
On-line Analysis of Nitrogen Containing Compounds in Complex Hydrocarbon Matrixes
07:49

On-line Analysis of Nitrogen Containing Compounds in Complex Hydrocarbon Matrixes

Published on: August 5, 2016

10.8K

Area of Science:

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Chromatography
  • Mass Spectrometry

Background:

  • Analysis of thermally labile and high-boiling point compounds using gas chromatography (GC) presents significant challenges.
  • Low-pressure GC, utilizing vacuum from mass spectrometry and wide-bore columns, allows for compound elution at reduced temperatures.
  • Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) enhances separation of coeluting compounds compared to conventional GC.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of low-pressure GC×GC-TOFMS versus conventional GC×GC-TOFMS for analyzing a pesticide standard mixture.
  • To investigate differences in elution temperatures, sensitivity, and peak capacity between the two GC×GC configurations.
  • To evaluate the applicability of low-pressure GC×GC-TOFMS for analyzing complex real-world samples like diesel fuel.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of an 8270 MegaMix Standard pesticide mixture using two GC×GC-TOFMS configurations: conventional (0.25 mm i.d. to 0.18 mm i.d. columns) and low-pressure (0.53 mm i.d. to 0.53 mm i.d. columns).
  • Comparison of elution temperatures, sensitivity, and peak capacity (nc,β,2D) between the configurations.
  • Analysis of a diesel fuel sample using both low-pressure and conventional GC×GC-TOFMS methods.

Main Results:

  • Compounds eluted approximately 30°C lower using the low-pressure GC×GC-TOFMS configuration.
  • Analysis time was significantly reduced to ~13 min with low-pressure GC×GC-TOFMS, compared to 33 min for conventional GC×GC-TOFMS.
  • Low-pressure GC×GC-TOFMS exhibited a lower β-corrected 2D peak capacity (1260) than conventional GC×GC-TOFMS (3588), but similar peak capacity production (93 vs. 107 peaks/min).

Conclusions:

  • Low-pressure GC×GC-TOFMS offers a substantial reduction in elution temperatures and analysis time for complex mixtures.
  • While overall peak capacity is reduced, the peak capacity production rate is comparable, making it a viable option for rapid analysis.
  • The low-pressure GC×GC-TOFMS configuration demonstrated effective analysis of a real-world diesel fuel sample, with improved peak capacity production compared to the conventional method.