Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography
Published on: September 2, 2020
Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography under low-pressure conditions
Michelle A Corbally1, Nicholas S Hinz2, Chris E Freye1
1High Explosives Science and Technology, Q-5, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.
Abstract:
The analysis of thermally labile and high-boiling point compounds by gas chromatography (GC) can be a challenge. One technique to overcome these challenges is low-pressure GC, which uses the vacuum produced from the mass spectrometer and wide-bore columns to elute compounds at significantly lower temperatures. While GC-MS is a powerful technique, comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC), allows for resolution of compounds that would typically coelute using GC. In this study, a pesticide standard mixture (8270 MegaMix Standard) was analyzed using a conventional GC × GC-TOFMS configuration (0.25 mm inner diameter (i.d.) to a 0.18 mm i.d. column) and low-pressure GC × GC-TOFMS configuration (0.53 mm i.d. to a 0.53 mm i.d. column). Elution temperatures, sensitivity, and peak capacity were investigated for both configurations. Compounds eluted an average of 30 °C less on the low-pressure GC × GC-TOFMS configuration compared to the conventional GC × GC-TOFMS configuration. Moreover, the compounds were separated in ∼13 min on the low-pressure GC × GC-TOFMS as opposed to 33 min for conventional GC × GC-TOFMS. However, due to the wide-bore columns and faster runtimes the low-pressure GC × GC-TOFMS had a lower, β corrected 2D peak capacity, nc,β,2D, of 1260 while the conventional GC × GC-TOFMS was 3588. Interestingly, both configurations yielded a similar peak capacity production of 93 peaks/min and 107 peaks/min for low-pressure and conventional GC × GC-TOFMS, respectively. A "real world" sample of diesel fuel was tested on the low-pressure and conventional GC × GC-TOFMS configurations and similar results were obtained compared to the pesticide standard mix except the peak capacity production of the low-pressure GC × GC-TOFMS configuration was higher than that of the conventional GC × GC-TOFMS method.
More Related Videos
11:44Qualitative Characterization of the Aqueous Fraction from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algae Using 2D Gas Chromatography with Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry
Published on: March 6, 2016
07:49On-line Analysis of Nitrogen Containing Compounds in Complex Hydrocarbon Matrixes
Published on: August 5, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Gas Chromatography: Introduction
In GC, a sample is vaporized and mixed with an inert carrier gas (the mobile phase), which transports it through a...
Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)
A gas chromatograph consists of a long, narrow capillary column with a polysiloxane coating on the inner wall....
Gas Chromatography: Types of Columns and Stationary Phases
For an analyte to remain on the column for a sufficient amount of time, it must exhibit some level of compatibility (or...
Types Of Column Chromatography
Gel Filtration Chromatography
When the...
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II