Prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra in patients with chronic low back pain: a descriptive cross-sectional...

Numerous causes of low back pain have been identified like spondylosis, spondylolysis, spondylolisthesis, facet lesions, discal abnormalities, vertebral instability, degenerative osteoarthritis, etc., These causes of low back pain are seen commonly in >50 years of age. Lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) is a common congenital anomaly with multitude of intermediate morphologic manifestations between the typical sacral and lumbar vertebra reported by some authors as a cause of low back pain. There are racial differences reported in the literature on the prevalence of LSTV. There is no common consensus in literature about the association between LSTV and low back pain. There is a paucity of literature on the subject in the Indian population, hence the current study was conducted.

60 cases of low back pain and 60 controls were included in the study. Patients between 18-50 years of age with low back pain of >12 weeks duration who were fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included in the study. The plain radiographs were screened by two observers (one Orthopaedician and one Radiologist) for the presence or absence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) and classification was determined by consensus. The incidence of LSTV was calculated in both the groups (cases and controls) and evaluated for statistical significance.

Prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) was found to be 38.33% in cases group as compared to control group (21.66%) and was statistically significant (p value <0.05). Prevalence of lumbarisation was higher in case group (10%) in comparison to control group (5.0%) but not found to be statistically significant. Prevalence of sacralisation was also found to be higher in case group (28.33%) as compared to control group (16.67%). This was not found to be statistically significant.

The present study showed a higher prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) in case group (38.33%) as compared to control group (21.66%) which was found to be statistically significant. Prevalence of lumbarisation and sacralisation were both found to be higher in the case group in comparison to control group, but the difference was not statistically significant. However, further studies with larger sample would be needed to conclusively determine any association between low back pain and subtypes of LSTV.