Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity
Published on: September 20, 2024
Progression pattern of non-amblyopic Anisomyopic eyes compared to Isomyopic eyes
Azfira Hussain1, Aparna Gopalakrishnan2, Saurav Chowdhury2
1Myopia Clinic, Unit of Medical Research Foundation, Sankara Nethralaya, No.41, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai, India. hussainazfira@gmail.com.
Insights
Children with bilateral anisometropic myopia (BAM) and unilateral anisometropic myopia (UAM) show distinct myopia progression patterns. BAM eyes progress slower than isomyopic eyes, while UAM eyes show similar progression rates to isomyopic eyes.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Pediatric Ophthalmology
- Myopia Research
Background:
- Anisomyopia, an interocular difference in refractive error, is common in children.
- Understanding myopia progression in different types of anisomyopia is crucial for timely intervention.
- Previous research suggests anisomyopes generally have higher refractive change rates than isomyopes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate and compare the myopia progression patterns in children with bilateral anisometropic myopia (BAM) and unilateral anisometropic myopia (UAM).
- To analyze the annual progression rates and trends in spherical equivalent (SE) between different refractive error categories.
- To determine how laterality and degree of ametropia influence refractive changes in anisomyopic children.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 8680 myopic children's records (ages 6-16) from Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai.
- Inclusion of 423 children with at least three years of consecutive follow-up data.
- Cycloplegic refraction converted to vector notation (SE, J0, J45) for analysis; anisomyopia defined as ≥1 D interocular SE difference.
Main Results:
- Isomyopic children showed a mean annual progression of -0.49 D.
- In BAM, both eyes showed significant progression, with the more myopic eye progressing slightly faster (-0.45 D/year) than the less myopic eye (-0.37 D/year).
- In UAM, myopic eyes progressed significantly faster (-0.39 D/year) than emmetropic fellow eyes (-0.22 D/year); the more myopic eyes showed a higher myopic trend compared to emmetropic eyes.
Conclusions:
- Bilateral anisometropic myopia (BAM) and unilateral anisometropic myopia (UAM) exhibit distinct myopia progression patterns.
- The progression rate in the myopic eyes of UAM is comparable to that of isomyopic eyes.
- BAM eyes demonstrate a slower rate of progression compared to isomyopic eyes, suggesting differing underlying mechanisms or responses to visual stimuli.
Abstract:
This study aimed to determine the progression pattern of non-amblyopic anisomyopic children from ages 6 to 16 years. This retrospective study analyzed the electronic medical records of 8680 myopic children who visited Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India over eight years (2009 to 2017). A total of 711 records were retrieved based on inclusion criteria. In addition, 423 records out of 711 had consecutive follow-up for three years (baseline plus three follow-up visits) and were considered to determine the progression pattern. The cycloplegic sphero-cylindrical refraction was taken for analysis and converted to vector notation of M (SE), J0, and J45. Anisomyopia referred to the interocular difference of myopic SE of ≥ 1 D whereas isomyopia referred to the interocular difference of myopic SE of < 1 D. Based on the refraction of the less ametropic eye, anisomyopes were further categorized into bilateral anisometropic myopia (BAM) and unilateral anisometropic myopia (UAM). The isomyopic cohort showed a mean annual progression of -0.49 ± 0.54 D (median [IQR] -0.38 D [{-0.75}-0.00]). In BAM, the mean annual progression of the more myopic eye was -0.45 ± 0.55 D (median [IQR] -0.38 D [{-0.75}-0.00]), and the less myopic eye was -0.37 ± 0.55 D (median [IQR] -0.25 D [{-0.63}-0.00]). This difference was significant (t (212) = -2.14, p < 0.05). In UAM, the myopic eyes (-0.39 ± 0.51 D; median [IQR] -0.25 D [{-0.75}-0.00]) showed a statistically significant higher mean annual progression compared to emmetropic eyes (-0.22 ± 0.36 D; median [IQR] 0.00 D [{-0.44}-0.00]; t (96) = -3.30, p < 0.001). In terms of progression trend, in the BAM group, the rate of change of mean SE between the more myopic and the less myopic eyes were similar (-1.12 ± 1.20 D; median [IQR] -1.13 D [{-2.00}-{-0.38}] vs. -1.05 ± 1.25 D; median [IQR] -0.88 D [{-1.75}-{-0.13}]; t (138) = -0.64, p > 0.05). However, the more myopic eyes of UAM showed a higher myopic trend compared to the emmetropic eyes (-1.37 ± 1.06 D; median [IQR] -1.32 D [{-2.13}-{-0.50}] vs. -0.96 ± 1.11 D; median [IQR] -0.75 D [{-1.56}-{-0.25}]; t (61) = -2.74, p < 0.05). Conclusion: Children with BAM and UAM eyes exhibit different progression patterns from each other. While the rate of the refractive shift in myopic eyes of UAM is similar to isomyopic eyes, BAM eyes present a slower rate of progression than isomyopic eyes. What is Known: • The rate of change of refraction in anisomyopes is higher compared to isomyopic children. • Less myopic eyes tend to shift towards more myopia while more myopic eyes show stable refraction. What is New: • The progression pattern of bilateral anisometropic myopia and unilateral anisometropic myopia differ from one another. • While the rate of the refractive shift in myopic eyes of unilateral anisometropic myopia is similar to isomyopic eyes, bilateral anisometropic myopia eyes present a slower rate of progression than isomyopic eyes. • The pattern of change in the interocular difference of anisometropia depends on the laterality (bilateral or unilateral ametropia), and degree of spherical equivalent in the more ametropic eye.
Related Concept Videos
Glaucoma: Overview
Focusing of Light in the Eye

