Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparative Histological Evaluation of Collagen Matrix Architectures for Soft Tissue Augmentation in the Oral Cavity: A Preclinical Canine Model.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Exploring the Interface Between International Nongovernmental Organizations and Local Vietnamese Hospitals in Cleft Care.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same author

A Systematic Review Comparing Endoscopic and Open Approaches in Orbital Fracture Surgery.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same author

Spring-Assisted Cranioplasty in Multisuture Craniosynostosis: Initial Experience From Thailand.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same author

Controversies Surrounding Critical-Size Defects: Influence of Age and Biological Characteristics.

Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials·2026
Same author

Comparative Histologic Evaluation of Bone Healing Following Piezotome and Osteotome Techniques for Potential Applications in Rhinoplasty.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

A Method for Fabricating Long Decellularized Scaffolds from Skeletal Muscle.

Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods·2026
Same journal

Design and Fabrication of Demountable 3D Microphysiological Systems.

Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods·2026
Same journal

Generation and Characterization of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Line UAEUi001-A from an Emirati Patient with Ventricular Septal Defect.

Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods·2026
Same journal

Automated Abnormal Vessel Detection in Re-Endothelialized Mouse Lungs: A Proof of Concept.

Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods·2026
Same journal

Tissue-Engineered Brain-Mimetic Niches to Model Braintropic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Metastasis.

Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods·2026
Same journal

A Defined 3D Hydrogel Model Recapitulates Key Transcriptomic Features of Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Ceramic Omnidirectional Bioprinting in Cell-Laden Suspensions for the Generation of Bone Analogs
10:19

Ceramic Omnidirectional Bioprinting in Cell-Laden Suspensions for the Generation of Bone Analogs

Published on: August 8, 2022

2.0K

Three-Dimensional Printing Bioceramic Scaffolds Using Direct-Ink-Writing for Craniomaxillofacial Bone Regeneration.

Vasudev Vivekanand Nayak1, Blaire V Slavin2, Edmara T P Bergamo3,4

  • 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.

Tissue Engineering. Part C, Methods
|July 18, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Three-dimensional printing (3DP) of bioceramic scaffolds shows promise for bone tissue regeneration (BTR). This technology enables patient-specific implants for complex bone defects, improving treatment outcomes.

Keywords:
3D printingbone regenerationin vivopreclinicalregenerative medicinescaffold

More Related Videos

Viability of Bioprinted Cellular Constructs Using a Three Dispenser Cartesian Printer
07:05

Viability of Bioprinted Cellular Constructs Using a Three Dispenser Cartesian Printer

Published on: September 22, 2015

10.1K
Human Cartilage Tissue Fabrication Using Three-dimensional Inkjet Printing Technology
09:32

Human Cartilage Tissue Fabrication Using Three-dimensional Inkjet Printing Technology

Published on: June 10, 2014

15.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Ceramic Omnidirectional Bioprinting in Cell-Laden Suspensions for the Generation of Bone Analogs
10:19

Ceramic Omnidirectional Bioprinting in Cell-Laden Suspensions for the Generation of Bone Analogs

Published on: August 8, 2022

2.0K
Viability of Bioprinted Cellular Constructs Using a Three Dispenser Cartesian Printer
07:05

Viability of Bioprinted Cellular Constructs Using a Three Dispenser Cartesian Printer

Published on: September 22, 2015

10.1K
Human Cartilage Tissue Fabrication Using Three-dimensional Inkjet Printing Technology
09:32

Human Cartilage Tissue Fabrication Using Three-dimensional Inkjet Printing Technology

Published on: June 10, 2014

15.8K

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Regenerative Medicine
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • Large bone defects pose significant treatment challenges, often requiring complex procedures and leading to poor patient outcomes.
  • Bioceramic materials, particularly beta-tricalcium phosphate, are increasingly utilized for bone tissue regeneration (BTR) due to their biocompatibility and resorption properties.
  • Traditional bone grafts have limitations, driving the need for advanced regenerative strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review recent advancements in three-dimensional printing (3DP) for fabricating bioceramic scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration (BTR).
  • To discuss the engineering principles and methodologies essential for utilizing 3DP in craniomaxillofacial reconstructive applications.
  • To explore future directions, including dynamic 3D printed constructs and pharmacological enhancements for treating diverse bone defects.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current literature on 3DP technology and bioceramic materials for bone tissue regeneration.
  • Analysis of engineering principles and methodologies for 3DP scaffold fabrication.
  • Examination of translational models demonstrating the efficacy of 3DP bioceramic scaffolds.

Main Results:

  • 3DP enables the creation of complex, patient-specific, and anatomically accurate bioceramic scaffolds.
  • These scaffolds possess porous structures mimicking the natural extracellular matrix, promoting cell growth and enhancing BTR.
  • Numerous studies highlight the potential of 3DP bioceramic scaffolds in restoring form and function in critically sized bone defects across various models.

Conclusions:

  • 3DP technology has revolutionized bone tissue regeneration by enabling the fabrication of advanced biomimetic scaffolds.
  • The application of 3DP bioceramic scaffolds shows significant potential for craniomaxillofacial reconstruction.
  • Future research focusing on dynamic constructs and bioactive integration promises broader applications for treating challenging bone defects.