Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2025

07:35
Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
Published on: October 11, 2018
7.6K
Cross-validation of the peppermint benchmarking experiment across three analytical platforms
Y Lan Pham1,2, Ruyi Yu1, Jonathan Beauchamp1
1Fraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging IVV, Freising, Germany.
Journal of Breath Research
|July 19, 2023
Summary
The Peppermint Experiment benchmarked breath analysis methods for volatile terpenes. High biological variability, not instrument differences, explains diverse study outcomes in breath biomarker research.
Area of Science:
- Analytical Chemistry
- Biomarker Discovery
- Pharmacokinetics
Background:
- Breath analysis lacks inter-comparability for biomarker studies.
- Volatile terpene washout profiles are key indicators.
- Standardized benchmarking is crucial for reliable results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To benchmark analytical platforms for breath analysis.
- To characterize terpene washout profiles from peppermint oil.
- To identify sources of variability in breath biomarker studies.
Main Methods:
- The Peppermint Experiment involved 11 volunteers providing triplicate breath samples.
- Analysis used Proton Transfer Reaction-Time-of-Flight-Mass Spectrometry (PTR-TOFMS), Gas Chromatography-Ion Mobility Spectrometry (GC-IMS), and Thermal Desorption Comprehensive Two-dimensional Gas Chromatography-Time-of-Flight-Mass Spectrometry (TD-GC×GC-TOFMS).
- Breath samples were collected using Buffered End-tidal (BET) samplers, handheld direct breath samplers, and Respiration Collection for in-vitro Analysis (ReCIVA) systems.
Main Results:
- Mean washout times were 448 min (PTR-TOFMS, GC-IMS) and 372 min (TD-GC×GC-TOFMS), aligning with benchmarks.
- Significant inter- and intra-individual variability in terpene washout profiles was observed.
- Low inter-instrument variability suggests biological factors drive outcome differences.
Conclusions:
- Biological variability, not analytical platform performance, is the primary driver of differing results in independent breath biomarker studies.
- Standardized breath analysis protocols are essential for consistent and comparable results.
- The Peppermint Experiment provides a benchmark for future breath analysis research.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Overview of Minitab
170
Minitab is a statistical software package designed for data analysis. With its origins in the 1970s and development at Pennsylvania State University, Minitab has grown significantly in its capabilities and applications. It plays a crucial role in quality management projects, especially in Six Sigma initiatives, by offering tools for process improvement and statistical analysis. Minitab's significance lies in its user-friendly interface, making complex statistical analysis accessible to...
170
Crossover Experiments
2.9K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
2.9K
Development of Analytical Methods
465
An analytical methodology can be divided into four sequential steps: technique, method, procedure, and protocol. A technique is a scientific principle that rationalizes a specific phenomenon through chemical measurements. Adapting a technique for analyzing a sample of interest is termed a method. The procedure outlines the directions for performing the analysis via an analytical method. The protocol is the detailed guidelines on the procedure, which should be strictly followed to obtain the...
465
Multiple Comparison Tests
3.9K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
3.9K
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
1.6K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
1.6K
Randomized Experiments
7.0K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.0K

