Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

34.6K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
34.6K
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

38.8K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
38.8K
Drive-Reduction Theory: Push Theory of Motivation01:27

Drive-Reduction Theory: Push Theory of Motivation

439
Clark Hull's drive-reduction theory, introduced in the 1940s and 1950s and often termed the "push theory" of motivation, provides a framework for understanding how biological and learned drives influence behavior. Hull suggested that motivation originates from the need to alleviate physiological tension caused by unmet biological necessities. The theory proposes that when a basic need, such as hunger or sleep, goes unfulfilled, it creates an internal imbalance. This imbalance, or...
439
Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation01:18

Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation

481
Incentive theory, or the "pull theory" of motivation, suggests that external rewards primarily drive behavior. Individuals are motivated to engage in activities when they anticipate a desirable outcome. This is why people often work hard for promotions or study intensively to achieve high grades. These incentives can be tangible, physical rewards such as money or promotions, or intangible, non-physical rewards like praise and social recognition.
The theory differentiates between...
481
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.2K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Punitive but discerning: Reputation can fuel ambiguously deserved punishment, but does not erode sensitivity to nuance.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2025
Same author

Partisans neither expect nor receive reputational rewards for sharing falsehoods over truth online.

PNAS nexus·2024
Same author

How reputation does (and does not) drive people to punish without looking.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023
Same author

Don't get it or don't spread it: comparing self-interested versus prosocial motivations for COVID-19 prevention behaviors.

Scientific reports·2021
Same author

Virtuous victims.

Science advances·2021
Same author

When do we punish people who don't?

Cognition·2019
Same journal

Geographical psychology: Spatial variation in psychological phenomena and their consequences.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Multi-brain neurofeedback: what are we training for?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

The developing vocal self.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Searching beyond decrements: Attentional guidance across the adult lifespan.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Looking into working memory through micro eye movements.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Timescapes of non-human experience.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 23, 2025

A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance
07:19

A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance

Published on: March 19, 2020

5.9K

A pull versus push framework for reputation.

Jillian J Jordan1

  • 1Harvard Business School, Soldiers Field, Boston, MA 02163, USA.

Trends in Cognitive Sciences
|July 19, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Reputation systems influence behavior by incentivizing good actions. This study proposes a new framework focusing on how evaluators are motivated by direct benefits or social pressure to reward positive reputations.

Keywords:
cooperationindirect reciprocitypartner choicereputation systemssignalingsocial norms

More Related Videos

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.1K
A Push-pull Protocol to Reduce Colonization of Bird Nest Boxes by Honey Bees
06:03

A Push-pull Protocol to Reduce Colonization of Bird Nest Boxes by Honey Bees

Published on: September 4, 2016

8.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 23, 2025

A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance
07:19

A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance

Published on: March 19, 2020

5.9K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.1K
A Push-pull Protocol to Reduce Colonization of Bird Nest Boxes by Honey Bees
06:03

A Push-pull Protocol to Reduce Colonization of Bird Nest Boxes by Honey Bees

Published on: September 4, 2016

8.7K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Social Psychology
  • Game Theory

Background:

  • Reputation systems are crucial for governing interactions and incentivizing cooperation.
  • Understanding the motivations of evaluators is key to designing effective reputation mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel reputation framework centered on the evaluator's perspective.
  • To differentiate between 'pull' (direct benefit) and 'push' (normative pressure) incentives for evaluators.
  • To enhance understanding of reputation literature and its application for social good.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual framework development.
  • Analysis of psychological and behavioral divergence under different incentive mechanisms.
  • Review and synthesis of empirical reputation literature.

Main Results:

  • Identified two distinct evaluator incentives: 'pull' towards beneficial actors and 'push' from normative pressure.
  • Proposed that these mechanisms can lead to different psychological and behavioral outcomes.
  • Offered a new lens for interpreting existing reputation research.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed framework deepens the understanding of reputation system dynamics.
  • Differentiating between pull and push incentives can inform the design of more effective reputation systems.
  • Leveraging these insights can optimize reputation systems for greater social benefit.