Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 22, 2025

11:49
Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence
Published on: March 9, 2015
15.8K
Fingermarks in wildlife forensics: A review.
Lauren Woodcock1, James Gooch1, Kim Wolff1
1King's Forensics, Department of Analytical, Environmental and Forensic Sciences, King's College London, 150 Stamford Street, London SE1 9NH, UK.
Forensic Science International
|July 21, 2023
Summary
Fingermark analysis offers a cost-effective method for identifying wildlife criminals, complementing DNA techniques. Further research is needed to validate these methods in real-world field conditions to combat wildlife crime.
Area of Science:
- Forensic Science
- Wildlife Forensics
- Criminology
Background:
- Wildlife crime, including poaching and trafficking, has severe ecological and societal consequences.
- Current forensic efforts against wildlife crime primarily rely on DNA-based techniques.
- Fingermark analysis, a cost-effective and field-deployable forensic method, remains underexplored in wildlife forensics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review existing literature on fingermark examination techniques applied to wildlife-related samples.
- To assess the potential of fingermark analysis as a tool to combat wildlife crime.
- To identify limitations in current research and suggest future directions.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of studies examining fingermark analysis on various wildlife materials (e.g., pangolin scales, ivory, bone, feathers, skins).
- Analysis of the applicability and limitations of commonly used fingermark detection techniques on these substrates.
- Evaluation of experimental designs and environmental validation in existing studies.
Main Results:
- Preliminary research indicates that standard fingermark analysis techniques can be applied to diverse wildlife-based items.
- Studies demonstrate the potential for identifying perpetrators through fingermarks on trafficked wildlife goods.
- Existing research often suffers from small sample sizes and lack of validation under realistic field conditions.
Conclusions:
- Fingermark analysis shows promise as a valuable, complementary technique in wildlife forensics.
- Further research with larger sample sizes and rigorous validation under relevant environmental conditions is crucial.
- Optimizing fingermark analysis techniques for specific field environments will enhance legal investigations and aid in reducing wildlife poaching.

