Pterygoid and tuberosity implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla: A retrospective cohort study

Rehabilitation of the partially or completely edentulous posterior maxilla using dental implants is a clinical challenge because of the presence of the maxillary sinus, as well as the low quality and quantity of bone in that region. In addition to bone augmentation procedures, posterior maxillary rehabilitation using implants includes their anchoring in bones such as the zygoma, pterygoid, and maxillary tuberosity, as well as in short implants. However, the performance of pterygoid and tuberosity implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla is unclear.

The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the survival of tuberosity and pterygoid implants in patients with posterior maxillary atrophy.

A nonprobability convenient sample of patients who had received fixed prostheses on implants placed in the maxillary tuberosity or pterygoid regions was analyzed retrospectively. Demographic variables included sex (male, female) and age. Implant-related variables included surface characteristics, site of placement, implant design, length, diameter, and anteroposterior insertion angle. Prosthetic-related variables included the type of reconstruction for rehabilitation and loading protocols. Implant survival, complications, crestal bone loss, and follow-up intervals were also documented. Collected data were analyzed at both patient and implant levels. The demographics and implant characteristics of patients receiving pterygoid or tuberosity implants were analyzed with a statistical software program (α=.05). Survival analysis was estimated by using the nonparametric Kaplan-Meier curve.

A total of 119 patients had 183 pterygoid or tuberosity implants inserted. Most implants in the pterygoid region (71.5%) were Ø4.1 mm (87.4%) and 15 mm in length (60.1%). The most common prostheses were complete maxillary reconstructions (49.2%) with late loading (74.3%). The average implant anteroposterior insertion angle was 60.8 degrees. The cumulative survival rate was 97.3% (n=178) during the mean follow-up period of 57 months (range 1 to 168 months). Among all implants placed, 2.7% failed (n=5) within 2 months of their placement. The statistically significant differences noted between tuberosity and pterygoid implants were related to design, surface characteristics, and loading. The average crestal bone loss was 1.5 mm.

The survival of the implants placed in the maxillary tuberosity and pterygoid regions was high in patients with posterior maxillary atrophy.