Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Appendectomy at cesarean section: a prospective study.

A K Parsons, M V Sauer, M T Parsons

    Obstetrics and Gynecology
    |October 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants increase the risk of four less common cancer types.

    ESMO open·2026
    Same author

    Whole-genome sequencing reveals clinically relevant insights into the aetiology of familial breast cancers.

    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2019
    Same author

    Compensating human subjects providing oocytes for stem cell research: 9-year experience and outcomes.

    Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics·2018
    Same author

    Gestational hypertension and donor eggs: elusive yet dangerous.

    BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2016
    Same author

    Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of the endometrium and intrauterine lesions: a consensus opinion from the International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) group.

    Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2009
    Same author

    Understanding the effects of age on female fertility.

    Minerva ginecologica·2003
    Same journal

    The Political Determinants of Obstetric Prescribing.

    Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
    Same journal

    Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Risk of Adverse Maternal Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

    Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
    Same journal

    Milestones in Motion: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean.

    Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
    Same journal

    Ebola Virus in Pregnancy.

    Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
    Same journal

    A Quality-Improvement Study Evaluating Three Postpartum Prophylactic Oxytocin Rates and Blood Loss After Vaginal Birth.

    Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
    Same journal

    The Effects of Climate Change on Obstetric and Gynecologic Health.

    Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
    See all related articles

    Prophylactic appendectomy during cesarean section is safe. This procedure adds minimal time and hospital stay without increasing infection risk, and can detect abnormalities like inflammation or tumors.

    Area of Science:

    • Obstetrics and Gynecology
    • Surgical Oncology

    Background:

    • Cesarean sections are common surgical procedures.
    • The appendix is often removed incidentally during abdominal surgeries.
    • The safety and benefits of prophylactic appendectomy during cesarean delivery are not well-established.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the safety and feasibility of performing prophylactic appendectomy during elective cesarean sections.
    • To assess the impact of prophylactic appendectomy on operative time, hospital stay, and postoperative recovery.
    • To determine the incidence of incidental appendiceal pathology in this patient population.

    Main Methods:

    • A prospective study involving 40 patients undergoing elective cesarean section with concurrent appendectomy.
    • A control group of patients undergoing elective cesarean section without appendectomy.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of clinical infection rates, blood loss, and gastrointestinal recovery between groups.

    • Main Results:

    • Appendectomy added approximately 15 minutes to the operation and extended hospital stay by 0.5 days.
    • No significant differences in clinical infection, blood loss, or recovery rates were observed between groups.
    • No increased morbidity or wound infections were noted.
    • 19.5% of removed appendixes showed abnormalities, including inflammation and a carcinoid tumor.

    Conclusions:

    • Prophylactic appendectomy can be safely performed in conjunction with elective cesarean sections.
    • The procedure does not appear to increase surgical risks or negatively impact patient recovery.
    • Appendectomy during cesarean delivery can identify asymptomatic appendiceal pathologies, potentially preventing future complications.