Interobserver Variability and Diagnostic Performance in Predicting Malignancy of Pancreatic Intraductal Papillary

Seo-Youn Choi1, Ji Hye Min1, Jung Hoon Kim1

  • 1From the Departments of Radiology (S.Y.C.) and Biostatistics, Clinical Trial Center (J.E.M.), Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea (J.H.M., J.H.L.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.H.K.); Department of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (H.J.P.); Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Y.Y.K.); Department of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Y.E.H.); Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.B.); and School of Health and Environmental Science, College of Health Science, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Y.H.C.).

Radiology
|July 25, 2023
PubMed

Insights

The 2017 guidelines for pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) show good MRI diagnostic performance for high-risk stigmata. Experienced radiologists achieved better agreement, but worrisome features showed less consistent interpretation.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology and Hepatology
  • Radiology and Imaging
  • Oncology

Background:

  • The 2017 international consensus guidelines are widely adopted for managing pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN).
  • Accurate assessment of IPMN malignancy potential is crucial for patient management and treatment decisions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the interobserver agreement among radiologists with varying experience levels in assessing IPMN using MRI.
  • To determine the diagnostic performance of MRI in predicting malignant IPMN based on the 2017 guidelines.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective multicenter study of 100 patients with pathologically proven pancreatic IPMN who underwent contrast-enhanced MRI.
  • Eight post-fellowship radiologists (4 experienced, 4 less-experienced) assessed MRI for high-risk stigmata and worrisome features per 2017 guidelines.
  • Interobserver agreement analyzed using Fleiss κ statistics; diagnostic performance assessed via ROC curve analysis.

Main Results:

  • Substantial interobserver agreement was observed for high-risk stigmata (e.g., main pancreatic duct size ≥10 mm, enhancing mural nodule ≥5 mm).
  • Fair to substantial agreement was noted for worrisome features, with more experienced radiologists showing better agreement for high-risk stigmata.
  • Overall diagnostic performance for predicting malignant IPMN was good (AUC range, 0.77-0.84), with substantial agreement (κ=0.76).

Conclusions:

  • The 2017 guidelines facilitate good diagnostic performance and substantial interobserver agreement for high-risk stigmata in malignant IPMN detection via MRI.
  • Interobserver agreement for worrisome features was less consistent, highlighting a potential area for guideline refinement.
  • Radiologist experience positively influences agreement in assessing high-risk stigmata for pancreatic IPMN.