Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 21, 2025
Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography
Published on: November 30, 2022
Weakly Supervised MRI Slice-Level Deep Learning Classification of Prostate Cancer Approximates Full Voxel- and
Cedric Weißer1,2, Nils Netzer1,2, Magdalena Görtz3,4
1Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Background:
Weakly supervised learning promises reduced annotation effort while maintaining performance.
Purpose:
To compare weakly supervised training with full slice-wise annotated training of a deep convolutional classification network (CNN) for prostate cancer (PC).
Study Type:
Retrospective.
Subjects:
One thousand four hundred eighty-nine consecutive institutional prostate MRI examinations from men with suspicion for PC (65 ± 8 years) between January 2015 and November 2020 were split into training (N = 794, enriched with 204 PROSTATEx examinations) and test set (N = 695).
Field Strength/Sequence:
1.5 and 3T, T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo and diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging.
Assessment:
Histopathological ground truth was provided by targeted and extended systematic biopsy. Reference training was performed using slice-level annotation (SLA) and compared to iterative training utilizing patient-level annotations (PLAs) with supervised feedback of CNN estimates into the next training iteration at three incremental training set sizes (N = 200, 500, 998). Model performance was assessed by comparing specificity at fixed sensitivity of 0.97 [254/262] emulating PI-RADS ≥ 3, and 0.88-0.90 [231-236/262] emulating PI-RADS ≥ 4 decisions.
Statistical Tests:
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) was compared using DeLong and Obuchowski test. Sensitivity and specificity were compared using McNemar test. Statistical significance threshold was P = 0.05.
Results:
Test set (N = 695) ROC-AUC performance of SLA (trained with 200/500/998 exams) was 0.75/0.80/0.83, respectively. PLA achieved lower ROC-AUC of 0.64/0.72/0.78. Both increased performance significantly with increasing training set size. ROC-AUC for SLA at 500 exams was comparable to PLA at 998 exams (P = 0.28). ROC-AUC was significantly different between SLA and PLA at same training set sizes, however the ROC-AUC difference decreased significantly from 200 to 998 training exams. Emulating PI-RADS ≥ 3 decisions, difference between PLA specificity of 0.12 [51/433] and SLA specificity of 0.13 [55/433] became undetectable (P = 1.0) at 998 exams. Emulating PI-RADS ≥ 4 decisions, at 998 exams, SLA specificity of 0.51 [221/433] remained higher than PLA specificity at 0.39 [170/433]. However, PLA specificity at 998 exams became comparable to SLA specificity of 0.37 [159/433] at 200 exams (P = 0.70).
Data Conclusion:
Weakly supervised training of a classification CNN using patient-level-only annotation had lower performance compared to training with slice-wise annotations, but improved significantly faster with additional training data.
Evidence Level:
3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
