Clinical Validation of an Adult-acquired Buried Penis Classification System Based on Standardized Evaluation of the Penis, Abdomen, and Scrotum
Charles H Schlaepfer1, Kevin J Flynn1, Nejd F Alsikafi2
1University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Objective:
To clinically validate a previously developed adult-acquired buried penis (AABP) classification system that is based on a standardized preoperative physical examination that subtypes patients by their penile skin/escutcheon complex (P), abdominal pannus (A), and scrotal skin (S).
Methods:
The Trauma and Urologic Reconstruction Network of Surgeons (TURNS) database was used to create an AABP cohort. Patients were retrospectively classified using the previously described PAS classification system. The frequency of subtypes, surgical methods utilized for AABP repair, and correlations between PAS classification and surgery subtypes were analyzed.
Results:
The final cohort consisted of 101 patients from 10 institutions. Interrater reliability between two reviewers was excellent (κ = 0.95). The most common subtypes were P2c (contributory escutcheon+insufficient penile skin; 27%) and P2a (contributory escutcheon+sufficient penile skin; 21%) for penile subtypes, A0 (no pannus; 41%) and A1 (noncontributory pannus; 39%) for abdominal subtypes, and S0 (normal scrotal skin with preserved scrotal sulcus; 71%) for scrotal subtypes. AABP repair procedures included escutcheonectomy (n = 59, 55%), scrotoplasty (n = 51, 48%), split-thickness skin grafting (n = 50, 47%), penile skin excision (n = 47, 44%) and panniculectomy (n = 7, 7%). P, A, and S subtypes were strongly associated with specific AABP surgical techniques.
Conclusion:
The PAS classification schema adequately describes AABP heterogeneity, is reproducible among observers, and correlates well with AABP surgery types. Future work will focus on how PAS subtypes affect both surgical and patient-centered outcomes.
