Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration01:10

Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration

379
A slider-crank mechanism converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider. The movement of the slider-crank is an example of general plane motion as the fluctuating angle between the crank and the connecting rod. Consider a segment AB where point A is at the end of the slider and point B is on the diametrically opposite end to point A, on a crack. The variance in...
379
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration01:22

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration

355
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame. The absolute velocity of point B is determined by adding the absolute velocity of point A, the relative velocity of point B in the rotating frame, and the effects caused by the angular velocity within the rotating frame.
Time differentiation is...
355

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of smartphone-based cough data in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis as a potential predictor of functional disability.

PloS one·2024
Same author

Comparing Handcrafted Features and Deep Neural Representations for Domain Generalization in Human Activity Recognition.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Integrating Domain Knowledge into Deep Learning for Skin Lesion Risk Prioritization to Assist Teledermatology Referral.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Human Activity Recognition for Indoor Localization Using Smartphone Inertial Sensors.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2021
Same author

An Infrastructure-Free Magnetic-Based Indoor Positioning System with Deep Learning.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2020
Same author

Fingerprints and Floor Plans Construction for Indoor Localisation Based on Crowdsourcing.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 20, 2025

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment
06:49

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment

Published on: December 11, 2015

8.9K

Exploring Regularization Methods for Domain Generalization in Accelerometer-Based Human Activity Recognition.

Nuno Bento1, Joana Rebelo1, André V Carreiro1

  • 1Associação Fraunhofer Portugal Research, Rua Alfredo Allen 455/461, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|July 29, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Domain Generalization (DG) in Human Activity Recognition (HAR) shows regularization methods like Mixup and SAM improve Out-of-Distribution (OOD) performance. However, handcrafted features still outperform deep learning models for HAR domain generalization.

Keywords:
Domain GeneralizationHuman Activity Recognitionaccelerometerdeep learningregularization

More Related Videos

Simulation of Human-induced Vibrations Based on the Characterized In-field Pedestrian Behavior
10:52

Simulation of Human-induced Vibrations Based on the Characterized In-field Pedestrian Behavior

Published on: April 13, 2016

8.8K
Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
06:37

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

3.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 20, 2025

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment
06:49

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment

Published on: December 11, 2015

8.9K
Simulation of Human-induced Vibrations Based on the Characterized In-field Pedestrian Behavior
10:52

Simulation of Human-induced Vibrations Based on the Characterized In-field Pedestrian Behavior

Published on: April 13, 2016

8.8K
Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
06:37

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

3.8K

Area of Science:

  • Machine Learning
  • Human Activity Recognition
  • Computer Vision

Background:

  • Domain Generalization (DG) is crucial in Machine Learning (ML).
  • Human Activity Recognition (HAR) presents inherent domain diversity, making it ideal for DG research.
  • Bridging the generalization gap between traditional and deep learning models is an ongoing challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate regularization methods for improving DG in HAR.
  • Compare deep learning models with handcrafted features in Out-of-Distribution (OOD) settings.
  • Assess the effectiveness of sparse training, Mixup, Distributionally Robust Optimization (DRO), and Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM).

Main Methods:

  • Applied regularization techniques (sparse training, Mixup, DRO, SAM) to deep learning models.
  • Evaluated model performance in OOD settings across multiple domains.
  • Utilized homogenized public datasets for consistent comparison.
  • Compared deep learning approaches against traditional models with handcrafted features.

Main Results:

  • Mixup and SAM demonstrated the strongest performance among the tested regularizers.
  • Despite improvements, regularized deep learning models did not surpass handcrafted feature-based models.
  • Regularization techniques offered partial improvements in OOD robustness.

Conclusions:

  • Regularization methods can enhance OOD robustness in HAR to a degree.
  • Handcrafted features remain superior for achieving domain generalization in HAR tasks.
  • Further research may be needed to fully leverage deep learning for HAR domain generalization.