Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2025

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector
Published on: July 25, 2014
A semi-empirical method for efficiency calibration of an HPGe detector against different sample densities
Islam M Nabil1, K M El-Kourghly2, A F El Sayed3
1Radiation Measurements Department, Main Chemical Laboratories, Cairo, Egypt; Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt.
Abstract:
In this work, a semi-empirical equation in terms of γ-energy, and sample density is derived, proposed, benchmarked, and applied for the peak efficiency calibration of an HPGe detector with respect to an axial source-to-detector configuration. The samples are in the form of cone-shaped Marinelli beakers of different densities in the range 0.7-1.6 g/cm3. The method employs the experimental measurements with the ANGLE-3 software calculations using the efficiency transfer method. The peak efficiency curve of an HPGe detector is calculated using the experimental measurements of point-like sources (133Ba, 137Cs, and 60Co). The ANGLE-3 software is then used to calculate the peak efficiency curves for samples with different densities in the γ-energy range 81-1332 keV. The peak efficiency curves are then fitted to get the energy coefficient; in addition, a linear relationship is then constructed between the energy coefficients and sample densities to get the density coefficients, and the derived equation as well. The derived equations are benchmarked using the peak efficiency curves by ANGLE-3 software in comparison with that the equation results. The results are found to be in agreement with an average relative error of about 1.5%. In addition, the derived equations are applied to estimate the activity concentration of radionuclides present in 5 cone-shaped samples with different densities using experimental measurements. The activity results are found to be in agreement with the certified values with an average relative error of about 2%. The limitation of the proposed equations is also discussed with respect to different material densities and different chemical compositions and correction factors for material composition self-attenuation for various materials are also presented.
More Related Videos
08:53Dependence of Laser-induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Results on Pulse Energies and Timing Parameters Using Soil Simulants
Published on: September 23, 2013
14:11Quantification of Hydrogen Concentrations in Surface and Interface Layers and Bulk Materials through Depth Profiling with Nuclear Reaction Analysis
Published on: March 29, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Lab
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Types of Detectors