Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Electrically evoked potentials in cochlear implant subjects.

R T Miyamoto

    The Laryngoscope
    |February 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Development of visual attention skills in prelingually deaf children who use cochlear implants.

    Ear and hearing·2005
    Same author

    Behavioral inhibition and clinical outcomes in children with cochlear implants.

    The Laryngoscope·2005
    Same author

    Facial nerve anomalies in cochlear implantation.

    Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology·2002
    Same author

    Cochlear implantation in auditory neuropathy.

    Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology·2002
    Same author

    Longitudinal communication skill acquisition in pediatric cochlear implant recipients.

    Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology·2002
    Same author

    Positron emission tomography in cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant recipients.

    Journal of communication disorders·2001
    Same journal

    Orticochea Flap for Reconstruction of Large Scalp Defects: Outcomes and Technique.

    The Laryngoscope·2026
    Same journal

    Rising Pediatric Button Battery Injuries Despite Safety Efforts: An Analysis of National Injury Data.

    The Laryngoscope·2026
    Same journal

    Laryngeal Nerve Protection Devices in Thyroid Surgery: A Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis.

    The Laryngoscope·2026
    Same journal

    Practice Patterns for the Management of Pediatric oSDB: What Is the Current National Landscape?

    The Laryngoscope·2026
    Same journal

    Vocal Fold Opening Position Impacts Bowing Measures in Age-Related Vocal Atrophy.

    The Laryngoscope·2026
    Same journal

    Association Between the Modified Frailty Index and Short-Term Total Thyroidectomy Complications.

    The Laryngoscope·2026
    See all related articles

    Electrically evoked potentials in cochlear implant users provide reliable indicators of auditory system response. These electrical responses closely mirror acoustic responses, aiding in assessing cochlear implant efficacy.

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Audiology
    • Biomedical Engineering

    Background:

    • Cochlear implantation aims to restore hearing by electrical stimulation.
    • Understanding electrically evoked potentials is crucial for assessing device function and patient response.
    • Comparing electrical and acoustic stimulation provides insights into neural processing.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate electrically evoked potentials as reliable indicators of cochlear implant response.
    • To compare electrically evoked responses with acoustically evoked responses in animal models and human patients.
    • To evaluate the relationship between electrically evoked potentials and behavioral thresholds.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparing brainstem evoked responses to electrical and acoustic stimulation in guinea pigs.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Recording electrically evoked middle latency responses and comparing them to behavioral thresholds in cochlear implant patients.
  • Analyzing electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in cochlear implant subjects.

    • Main Results:

    • Electrical and acoustic stimulation yielded similar response patterns in guinea pigs, irrespective of electrode placement.
    • Electrically evoked potentials in patients correlated with subjective behavioral responses.
    • Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses showed shorter latencies and narrower interpeak intervals compared to acoustic responses.

    Conclusions:

    • Electrically evoked potentials are valid indicators of auditory system response to cochlear implantation.
    • Electrical stimulation parameters can be optimized based on evoked potential measurements.
    • This research supports the use of electrophysiological measures for evaluating cochlear implant performance.