Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Novel Protocol for Intracameral Injections to Enhance Precision in Rodent Ophthalmology
Published on: May 31, 2024
Which is More Effective and Safer? Comparison of Propensity Score-Matched Microhook Ab Interno Trabeculotomy and
Ryo Asaoka1,2, Shunsuke Nakakura3, Tsukasa Mochizuki4
1Department of Ophthalmology, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, 2-12-12 Sumiyoshi, Naka-Ku, Hamamatsu City, Shizuoka, Japan. rasaoka-tky@umin.ac.jp.
A new study found that ab interno trabeculotomy (LOT) and iStent inject W implantation (iStent) offer similar safety and surgical outcomes when combined with cataract surgery for glaucoma patients. Both procedures effectively reduced intraocular pressure and medication needs.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Surgical Innovation
- Glaucoma Management
Background:
- Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) management often involves reducing intraocular pressure (IOP).
- Cataract surgery is frequently combined with glaucoma procedures to address both conditions simultaneously.
- Ab interno trabeculotomy (LOT) and iStent inject W (iStent) are minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) used in conjunction with cataract surgery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the surgical outcomes of LOT and iStent implantation when performed alongside cataract surgery.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of these two MIGS procedures in patients with POAG.
- To match key patient factors including age, IOP, medication score, central corneal thickness (CCT), and axial length between the surgical groups.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study included 100 eyes from 75/79 patients diagnosed with POAG.
- Patients were divided into two groups: LOT combined with cataract surgery and iStent combined with cataract surgery.
- Propensity score matching was used to ensure comparability of background factors between the LOT and iStent groups.
Main Results:
- Preoperative characteristics such as age, IOP, medication score, CCT, and axial length were similar between the LOT and iStent groups.
- Postoperative IOP and medication scores showed no significant differences between the two groups.
- The change in IOP was -2.1 ± 3.3 mmHg for LOT and -1.5 ± 3.0 mmHg for iStent, with no significant difference. Postoperative IOP was associated with preoperative IOP and CCT.
- Complication rates, including hyphema and transient ocular hypertension, were comparable and low in both groups.
Conclusions:
- LOT and iStent implantation demonstrate similar surgical outcomes and safety profiles when combined with cataract surgery for POAG.
- Both procedures effectively reduce IOP and medication burden, suggesting they are viable options for glaucoma management.
- Preoperative IOP and CCT were identified as significant predictors of postoperative IOP in both surgical groups.
More Related Videos
07:13An Alternative and Validated Injection Method for Accessing the Subretinal Space via a Transcleral Posterior Approach
Published on: December 7, 2016
09:18A Comparative Study of Drug Delivery Methods Targeted to the Mouse Inner Ear: Bullostomy Versus Transtympanic Injection
Published on: March 8, 2017