Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Exploring effective ways to increase reliable positive samples for machine learning-based urban waterlogging
Xianzhe Tang1, Zhanyu Wu2, Wei Liu3
1Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Land Use and Consolidation, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; College of Natural Resources and Environment, Joint Institute for Environment & Education, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Optimizing urban waterlogging susceptibility models requires reliable positive samples. The Optimized Seed Spread Algorithm (OSSA) effectively simulates water flow to generate accurate samples, outperforming the Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique (SMOTE).
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Geographic Information Science
- Urban Planning
Background:
- Machine learning models for urban waterlogging susceptibility often face class imbalance, with limited positive samples.
- Improving training data quality is crucial for enhancing model performance and accuracy in waterlogging prediction.
- Existing oversampling techniques may not adequately represent the physical mechanisms of waterlogging.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate effective methods for increasing reliable positive samples in urban waterlogging susceptibility studies.
- To compare the performance of oversampling (SMOTE) and physical simulation (OSSA) approaches for sample generation.
- To evaluate the impact of different sample generation techniques on classifier performance and waterlogging susceptibility map (WSM) accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Employed Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique (SMOTE) and Optimized Seed Spread Algorithm (OSSA) to generate synthetic positive samples.
- Conducted a case study of waterlogging in Shenzhen using eight spatial variables.
- Compared classifier performance and WSM accuracy using original samples, SMOTE-generated samples, and OSSA-generated samples.
Main Results:
- Classifiers trained with SMOTE-generated samples performed worse than those trained with original samples.
- OSSA significantly improved the performance of trained classifiers compared to original samples.
- SMOTE did not improve WSM accuracy, while OSSA markedly increased it.
Conclusions:
- SMOTE is unreliable for generating valid positive samples in Shenzhen's waterlogging analysis due to its feature-space-based approach.
- OSSA, by simulating water flow mechanisms, effectively generates reliable positive samples, enhancing waterlogging susceptibility models.
- Physical simulation methods like OSSA are superior to data-driven oversampling for improving the accuracy of waterlogging susceptibility assessments.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Sampling Methods: Sample Types
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...

