Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Pretargeted Radioimmunotherapy Based on the Inverse Electron Demand Diels-Alder Reaction
Published on: January 29, 2019
Preoperative Radiotherapy with a Simultaneous Integrated Boost Compared to Chemoradiotherapy for cT3-4 Rectal Cancer:
Benedikt Engels1, Antonino De Paoli2, Elena Delmastro3
1Department of Radiotherapy, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer showed similar outcomes to RT with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) without chemotherapy. This RTSIB approach is a viable option for patients unable to undergo fluorouracil-based CRT.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Radiation Oncology
- Gastrointestinal Oncology
Background:
- Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (T3-4).
- Novel treatment strategies are being explored to improve outcomes and patient tolerance.
- This study compares standard CRT with a novel image-guided intensity-modulated RT (IG-IMRT) and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) approach.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of preoperative IG-IMRT with SIB (RTSIB) versus standard CRT in patients with T3-4 rectal cancer.
- To evaluate metabolic response, toxicity, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local control (LC).
Main Methods:
- A multi-center randomized trial involving 174 patients with cT3-4 rectal cancer.
- Patients were assigned to either preoperative CRT (IG-IMRT + capecitabine) or RTSIB (IG-IMRT with SIB to the tumor up to 55.2 Gy).
- Outcomes including toxicity, metabolic response (SUVmax change), pCR, OS, PFS, and LC were assessed.
Main Results:
- Grade 3 acute toxicities were comparable (6% in CRT vs. 4% in RTSIB).
- No significant difference in metabolic response (SUVmax change) between arms (p=0.43).
- Pathologic complete response (pCR) was 24% with CRT versus 14% with RTSIB; however, 5-year OS, PFS, and LC showed no significant differences.
Conclusions:
- The preoperative RTSIB approach is non-inferior to standard CRT regarding metabolic response, toxicity, OS, PFS, and LC.
- RTSIB offers a valuable alternative treatment option for rectal cancer patients who are not candidates for fluorouracil-based CRT.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
12:45Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2022