Mapping of lattice distortion in martensitic steel-Comparison of different evaluation methods of EBSD patterns

To visualize the varying tetragonal distortions in high carbon martensitic steels by EBSD, two different approaches have been applied on backscattered Kikuchi diffraction (BKD) patterns. A band-edge refinement technique called Refined Accuracy (RA) (Oxford Instruments) is compared with a technique called Pattern Matching (PM), which optimizes the fit to a simulated BKD signal. RA distinguishes between hypothetical phases of different fixed c/a, while PM determines a best fitting continuous c/a by projective transformation of a master pattern. Both techniques require stored BKD patterns. The sensitivity of the c/a-determination was tested by investigating the microstructure of a ferritic steel with an expected c/a=1. The influence of the Kikuchi pattern noise on c/a was compared for a single or 40 averaged frames per measuring point, and turned out to be not significant. The application of RA and PM on the martensitic microstructure delivered qualitatively similar maps of c/a. The comparison of RA and PM shows that RA is suitably fast and precise during mapping the martensite c/a ratio in analyses of high carbon martensite, especially for fast initial surveys. As RA leads quantitatively to higher noise in c/a, the PM analysis can be used for higher precision results.