Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

1.5K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
1.5K
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

959
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
959
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.0K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.0K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.1K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.1K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

1.1K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
1.1K
¹H NMR Signal Multiplicity: Splitting Patterns01:13

¹H NMR Signal Multiplicity: Splitting Patterns

5.2K
When protons A and X are coupled, their nuclear spin energy levels are slightly modified. This is because the energy required to excite proton A to a spin state parallel to proton X is slightly different from the energy required for it to become anti-parallel to spin X. Consequently, there are two possible excitation frequencies for A (A1 and A2), depending on the spin state of X, and vice versa. The mutual nature of coupling implies that the difference between frequencies A1 and A2, indicated...
5.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pressure-Induced Drift Artifacts in Stretchable Liquid Metal ThinFilm Electrocardiogram Electrodes.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2026
Same author

Unraveling the effects of surface functional groups and assembly orientations on the interfacial mechanics of MXene/Silk composites.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2026
Same author

Indium-free perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells with tin oxide recombination layer and electrodes.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Progress of iron-based magnetic nanomaterials: synthesis, properties, and emerging applications.

Nanotechnology·2026
Same author

Phonons regulate covalency: a new way to modulate the magnetism and Curie temperature of CrI<sub>3</sub>.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2026
Same author

A review of SPAD array chip design for direct time-of-flight LiDAR.

Discover nano·2026
Same journal

Ultra-Sensitive UV Photodetectors Enabled by Built-in Electric Fields in Hierarchical NP-Type Porous Silicon.

Nanotechnology·2026
Same journal

Effect of sintering temperature on structural, microstructural and magnetic properties of La<sub>0.8</sub>Sr<sub>0.2</sub>MnO<sub>3</sub>: Evolution of faceting and terrace like morphology.

Nanotechnology·2026
Same journal

Engineered V2C MXene Anchored Cu Nanoparticles for Selective Nitrate/Nitrite Sensing and Magneto-Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Reaction.

Nanotechnology·2026
Same journal

Quantitative Mechanism Separation of Single-Event Transients in Nanosheet Transistors via TCAD Simulation.

Nanotechnology·2026
Same journal

Antibacterial, mechanical and curing properties of PMMA bone cement loaded with copper nanoparticles.

Nanotechnology·2026
Same journal

Deep learning-enabled self-powered bimodal flexible sensor for intelligent access control.

Nanotechnology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits on Superconducting Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Platform
05:39

Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits on Superconducting Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Platform

Published on: August 2, 2019

9.7K

Multi-physics coupling in nanoscale spintronics and quantum devices

Gang Zhang1, Yuan Cheng2,3, Tian-Ling Ren4,5

  • 1Institute of High Performance Computing, A*STAR 138632, Singapore.

Nanotechnology
|August 14, 2023
PubMed
Summary

No abstract available in PubMed .

Keywords:
CollectionsFocusMulti-physicscouplingsnanoscalespintronics

More Related Videos

All-electronic Nanosecond-resolved Scanning Tunneling Microscopy: Facilitating the Investigation of Single Dopant Charge Dynamics
11:33

All-electronic Nanosecond-resolved Scanning Tunneling Microscopy: Facilitating the Investigation of Single Dopant Charge Dynamics

Published on: January 19, 2018

9.7K
Atomically Traceable Nanostructure Fabrication
12:35

Atomically Traceable Nanostructure Fabrication

Published on: July 17, 2015

8.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits on Superconducting Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Platform
05:39

Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits on Superconducting Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Platform

Published on: August 2, 2019

9.7K
All-electronic Nanosecond-resolved Scanning Tunneling Microscopy: Facilitating the Investigation of Single Dopant Charge Dynamics
11:33

All-electronic Nanosecond-resolved Scanning Tunneling Microscopy: Facilitating the Investigation of Single Dopant Charge Dynamics

Published on: January 19, 2018

9.7K
Atomically Traceable Nanostructure Fabrication
12:35

Atomically Traceable Nanostructure Fabrication

Published on: July 17, 2015

8.8K