Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

The Stanford Prison Experiment

The Stanford Prison Experiment

The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.

Torts II

Torts II

Intentional torts in healthcare refer to deliberate actions that cause harm or infringe on the rights of others. Understanding these torts is crucial for healthcare professionals to avoid legal liabilities and maintain ethical standards in patient care.

Torts III

Torts III

Types of Quasi-intentional Torts in Healthcare
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.

Repressed Memory

Repressed Memory

Repressed memories are a psychological phenomenon where memories of traumatic events are unconsciously blocked from a person's awareness. This process occurs as a defense mechanism, protecting the mind from the emotional impact of distressing or painful experiences. For example, a person who has experienced childhood trauma may grow up with no conscious recollection of the event. In such cases, the memories are thought to be buried deep within the subconscious, inaccessible to the conscious...

False Memories

False Memories

False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...

Punishment

Punishment

Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A Description of the Forensic Monitoring System of the Missouri Department of Mental Health.

Behavioral sciences & the law·2016

Same author

Extended-release divalproex sodium for mood stabilization.

Pharmacotherapy·2004

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 19, 2025

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence

Published on: March 23, 2022

The Value of Conditional Release for Insanity Acquittees.

James B Reynolds¹

¹Dr. Reynolds is Associate Professor of Psychiatry, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, and Retired Chair, Forensic Review Committee, Western Missouri, Missouri Department of Mental Health, St. Joseph, MO. james.reynolds@dmh.mo.gov.

The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

|August 14, 2023

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Conditional release of insanity acquittees lacks consistent monitoring, impacting public safety. This study examines North Carolina

Keywords:

conditional release forensic psychiatry insanity acquittee monitoring recidivism

More Related Videos

Extinction Training During the Reconsolidation Window Prevents Recovery of Fear

Extinction Training During the Reconsolidation Window Prevents Recovery of Fear

Published on: August 24, 2012

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients

Published on: February 6, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 19, 2025

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence

Published on: March 23, 2022

Extinction Training During the Reconsolidation Window Prevents Recovery of Fear

Extinction Training During the Reconsolidation Window Prevents Recovery of Fear

Published on: August 24, 2012

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients

Published on: February 6, 2021

Area of Science:

Forensic Psychiatry
Criminology
Public Health

Background:

Conditional release procedures for insanity acquittees vary significantly across states, impacting public safety and research.
North Carolina faces institutional barriers hindering research on conditional release outcomes for insanity acquittees.
A lack of formal post-release monitoring systems in some states contrasts with stricter protocols in others.

Purpose of the Study:

To analyze the post-release outcomes of insanity acquittees in North Carolina from 1996 to 2020.
To compare these outcomes with states that have strict post-release monitoring programs.
To identify factors associated with release outcomes and examine potential systemic biases.

Main Methods:

Retrospective analysis of conditional release data for insanity acquittees in North Carolina (1996-2020).
Comparison of outcomes between North Carolina and states with formal post-release monitoring.
Analysis of demographic, psychiatric, and criminological characteristics influencing release outcomes.

Main Results:

Findings highlight the impact of varying release procedures and monitoring systems on post-release outcomes.
Associations were found between acquittee characteristics and release success.
Evidence suggests a potential systemic bias against minority acquittees in North Carolina's commitment and release processes.

Conclusions:

The study underscores the need for robust post-release monitoring systems for insanity acquittees to ensure public safety.
Further research across multiple jurisdictions is recommended to understand and improve conditional release practices.
Addressing systemic biases in the legal and mental health systems is crucial for equitable treatment of insanity acquittees.