Cohort study of short-term outcomes after ACL-reconstruction using autograft with internal brace reinforcement versus...

The gold standard treatment for Anterior Cruciate Ligament injury is reconstruction (ACL-R). Graft failure is the concern and ensuring a durable initial graft with rapid integration is crucial. Graft augmentation with implantable devices (internal brace reinforcement) is a technique purported to reduce the risk of rupture and hasten recovery. Few studies have examined these techniques, in particular when compared to non-augmented grafts. This study assesses the short-term outcome of ACL-R using augmented and non-augmented hamstring tendon autografts.

This was a retrospective cohort study comparing augmented and non-augmented ACL-R. All procedures were performed in a single centre using the same technique. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS] was used to assess patient-reported outcomes.

There were 70 patients in the augmented and 111 patients in the control group. Mean graft diameter in the augmented group was 8.82 mm versus 8.44 mm in the non-augmented. Six strand graft was achievable in 73.5% of the augmented group compared to 33% in the non-augmented group. Two graft failures were reported in the non-augmented group and none in the augmented group. Patient satisfaction rates were higher in the augmented group. There was a statistically insignificant improvement in the postoperative KOOS in the augmented group compared to the non-augmented group (p 0.6). Irrespective of augmentation status, no correlation was found between the functional score and age, or femoral tunnel width.

No statistically significant difference was demonstrated in the short-term functional outcome of ACL reconstruction using an augmented or non-augmented hamstring graft. Augmented ACL-R may achieve superior graft diameters, failure rates and patient reported outcomes when compared to nonaugmented ACL-R. Prospective trials are needed to examine this further.