[A comparative study of the effects of citrate and heparin anticoagulation on coagulation function and efficacy in children with septic shock undergoing continuous blood purification]
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Author Spotlight: Simulating Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Using a Neonatal Piglet Model
Published on: May 26, 2023
Xiaoming Zhong1, Shasha Luo1, Ruihua Ren1
1Department of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, the First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Gannan 341000, Jiangxi, China.
Insights
In children with septic shock, both heparin and citrate anticoagulation effectively reduced inflammatory markers during continuous blood purification (CBP). Heparin showed a greater benefit in improving coagulation function and potentially preventing disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
- Nephrology
- Hematology
Context:
- Septic shock in children is a life-threatening condition often requiring continuous blood purification (CBP).
- Anticoagulation is crucial during CBP to maintain circuit patency but carries bleeding risks.
- Citrate and heparin are common anticoagulation strategies with distinct mechanisms and potential effects.
Purpose:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of regional citrate anticoagulation versus systemic heparin anticoagulation in pediatric patients with septic shock undergoing CBP.
- To evaluate the impact of these anticoagulation methods on coagulation parameters and inflammatory markers.
- To provide evidence-based guidance for anticoagulation selection in this vulnerable population.
Summary:
- A case-control study involving 37 children with septic shock undergoing CBP compared citrate and heparin anticoagulation.
- Both methods significantly reduced inflammatory markers (IL-6, TNF-α, hs-CRP, PCT) post-treatment.
- Systemic heparin anticoagulation led to a significant shortening of prothrombin time (PT) and reduction in D-dimer levels compared to citrate, suggesting potential benefits in preventing disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).
Impact:
- Findings suggest that while both anticoagulants are effective in managing inflammation during CBP in pediatric septic shock, heparin may offer superior benefits in optimizing coagulation profiles.
- This study provides valuable insights for clinicians in selecting appropriate anticoagulation strategies to improve outcomes in children with septic shock undergoing CBP.
- Further research could explore long-term outcomes and specific DIC prevention efficacy.
Objective:
To compare the effects of citrate and heparin anticoagulation on coagulation function and efficacy in children with septic shock undergoing continuous blood purification (CBP), and to provide guidance for CBP anticoagulation in children with septic shock.
Methods:
A case control study was conducted. Thirty-seven children with septic shock admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of the First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University from July 2019 to September 2022 were enrolled as the research subjects. The patients were divided into citrate local anticoagulation group and heparin systemic anticoagulation group according to different anticoagulation methods. The baseline data, the level of coagulation indicators [prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thrombin time (TT), fibrinogen (Fib), D-dimer] before treatment and 1 day after weaning from CBP, serum inflammatory mediators [interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), hypersensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), procalcitonin (PCT)], bleeding complications during CBP and 7-day mortality were collected.
Results:
A total of 37 cases were enrolled finally, including 17 cases with citric acid local anticoagulation and 20 cases with heparin systemic anticoagulation. There was no statistically significant difference in general data such as gender, age, and body weight of children between the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline levels of coagulation indicators and inflammatory mediators before treatment of children between the two groups. One day after weaning from CBP, both groups showed varying degrees of improvement in coagulation indicators compared with those before treatment. Compared with before treatment, the PT of the heparin systemic anticoagulation group was significantly shortened after 1 day of weaning (s: 11.82±2.05 vs. 13.64±2.54), APTT and TT were significantly prolonged [APTT (s): 51.54±12.69 vs. 35.53±10.79, TT (s): 21.95±4.74 vs. 19.30±3.33], D-dimer level was significantly reduced (mg/L: 1.92±1.58 vs. 4.94±3.94), with statistically significant differences (all P < 0.05). While in the citrate local anticoagulation group, only APTT was significantly prolonged after treatment compared with that before treatment (s: 49.28±10.32 vs. 34.34±10.32, P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in other coagulation indicators compared with before treatment. Compared with the citric acid local anticoagulation group, the PT of the heparin systemic anticoagulation group was significantly shortened after treatment (s: 11.82±2.05 vs. 13.61±3.05, P < 0.05), and the D-dimer level was significantly reduced (mg/L: 1.92±1.58 vs. 3.77±2.38, P < 0.01). The levels of inflammatory mediators in both groups were significantly reduced 1 day after CBP weaning compared with those before treatment [citric acid local anticoagulation group: hs-CRP (mg/L) was 12.53±5.44 vs. 22.65±7.27, PCT (μg/L) was 1.86±1.20 vs. 3.30±2.34, IL-6 (ng/L) was 148.48±34.83 vs. 202.32±48.62, TNF-α (ng/L) was 21.38±7.71 vs. 55.14±15.07; heparin systemic anticoagulation group: hs-CRP (mg/L) was 11.82±4.93 vs. 21.62±8.35, PCT (μg/L) was 1.90±1.08 vs. 3.18±1.97, IL-6 (ng/L) was 143.81±33.41 vs. 194.02±46.89, TNF-α (ng/L) was 22.44±8.17 vs. 56.17±16.92, all P < 0.05]. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (all P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in bleeding complication during CBP and 7-day mortality in children between the citrate local anticoagulation group and the heparin systemic anticoagulation group (5.9% vs. 30.0%, 17.6% vs. 20.0%, both P > 0.05).
Conclusions:
Heparin for systemic anticoagulation and regional citrate anticoagulation can significantly reduce the levels of IL-6, TNF-α, hs-CRP and PCT in children with septic shock, and relieve inflammatory storm. Compared with citric acid local anticoagulation, heparin systemic anticoagulation can shorten the PT and reduce the level of D-dimer in children with septic shock, which may benefit in the prevention and treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care

