Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Dried Blood Spot Collection of Health Biomarkers to Maximize Participation in Population Studies
Published on: January 28, 2014
The Role of Clinical Assessment in the Era of Biomarkers
Arenn F Carlos1, Keith A Josephs2
1Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St. S.W., Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. carlos.arennfaye@mayo.edu.
Insights
Biomarkers aid neurodegenerative disease assessment but cannot replace clinical evaluation. A seven-level framework highlights biomarkers
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience and Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Hippocratic Medicine emphasized patient, disease, and physician, focusing on observation and reasoning.
- Modern medicine has shifted from physician-centered to patient-centered care, enhancing the patient-physician relationship.
- Biomarkers are revolutionizing medicine by revealing disease pathomechanisms and biological changes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To define a seven-level theoretical construct for the utility of biomarkers in neurodegenerative diseases.
- To delineate the supportive and potentially surpassing roles of biomarkers compared to clinical assessment.
Main Methods:
- Development of a seven-level framework to categorize biomarker utility.
- Analysis of biomarker capabilities in detecting susceptibility, dysfunction, and pathological changes.
- Comparison of biomarker-driven insights against traditional clinical assessment in neurodegenerative contexts.
Main Results:
- Levels 1-3 biomarkers support clinical assessment by increasing diagnostic accuracy and confidence.
- Levels 4-7 biomarkers show potential to exceed clinical assessment in early detection and pathology prediction.
- Biomarkers can potentiate, but not substitute, clinical assessment in neurodegenerative diseases.
Conclusions:
- Clinical assessment remains indispensable for the humanistic and sociocultural aspects of patient care.
- The systematic observation and reasoning integral to clinical assessment should be preserved.
- A balanced approach integrating advanced biomarkers with robust clinical assessment is crucial for optimal neurodegenerative disease management.
Abstract:
Hippocratic Medicine revolved around the three main principles of patient, disease, and physician and promoted the systematic observation of patients, rational reasoning, and interpretation of collected information. Although these remain the cardinal features of clinical assessment today, Medicine has evolved from a more physician-centered to a more patient-centered approach. Clinical assessment allows physicians to encounter, observe, evaluate, and connect with patients. This establishes the patient-physician relationship and facilitates a better understanding of the patient-disease relationship, as the ultimate goal is to diagnose, prognosticate, and treat. Biomarkers are at the core of the more disease-centered approach that is currently revolutionizing Medicine as they provide insight into the underlying disease pathomechanisms and biological changes. Genetic, biochemical, radiographic, and clinical biomarkers are currently used. Here, we define a seven-level theoretical construct for the utility of biomarkers in neurodegenerative diseases. Level 1-3 biomarkers are considered supportive of clinical assessment, capable of detecting susceptibility or risk factors, non-specific neurodegeneration or dysfunction, and/or changes at the individual level which help increase clinical diagnostic accuracy and confidence. Level 4-7 biomarkers have the potential to surpass the utility of clinical assessment through detection of early disease stages and prediction of underlying pathology. In neurodegenerative diseases, biomarkers can potentiate, but cannot substitute, clinical assessment. In this current era, aside from adding to the discovery, evaluation/validation, and implementation of more biomarkers, clinical assessment remains crucial to maintaining the personal, humanistic, and sociocultural aspects of patient care. We would argue that clinical assessment is a custom that should never go obsolete.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Nursing Assessment
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments...
Clinical Trials: Overview

