Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2025

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability and the risk of cardiovascular disease: a prospective cohort analysis
Shouling Wu1, Xue Tian2,3,4,5, Qin Xu2,3
1Department of Cardiology, Kailuan Hospital, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China.
Insights
Large blood pressure variability, especially rising systolic blood pressure (SBP), significantly increases cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, particularly in men. This highlights the importance of monitoring BP fluctuations for CVD prevention.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Blood pressure (BP) variability is linked to subclinical brain disease and may contribute to cardiovascular disease (CVD) development.
- Understanding the impact of BP variation's magnitude, direction, and timing is crucial for CVD risk assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between BP variation and the risk of incident CVD in a Chinese population.
- To analyze how BP variability magnitude, direction, and time intervals influence CVD risk.
Main Methods:
- The study analyzed data from 64,810 CVD-free participants in the Kailuan study.
- BP variability was calculated based on sequential visits, considering magnitude and direction.
- Median follow-up was 10.91 years, with 4129 incident CVD cases recorded.
Main Results:
- High systolic blood pressure (SBP) variability was associated with increased CVD risk (HR, 1.31).
- A rising SBP trend significantly elevated CVD risk (HR, 6.17), while falling SBP decreased it (HR, 0.52).
- These associations were more pronounced with longer time intervals and were significant in men.
Conclusions:
- Large SBP variation, particularly in the rising direction, is a significant risk factor for incident CVD.
- Monitoring BP variability, especially in men, is essential for predicting and preventing cardiovascular events.
Abstract:
Large blood pressure (BP) variability contributed to subclinical brain disease thus may be implicated in the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study included 64,810 CVD-free participants who attended the first two examinations from the Kailuan study to investigate the association of BP variation, considering its magnitude, direction, and time interval prior to CVD diagnosis, with the risk of CVD in Chinese population. Magnitude and directional BP variability was calculated as absolute BP difference or BP difference value divided by mean BP over 2 sequential visits, respectively. During a median follow-up of 10.91 years, a total of 4129 cases of CVD. A large SBP variability (the highest vs the lowest tertile) was associated with a higher risk of CVD (adjusted HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.22-1.41). The associations were stronger with longer time intervals, the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for CVD was 1.30 (95% CI, 1.20-1.39) at 1 years, 1.32 (1.18-1.40) at 3 years, and 1.34 (1.20-1.45) at 5 years. For directional SBP variability, rise in SBP was associated with an increased risk of CVD (HR, 6.17; 95% CI, 5.65-6.75), while fall in SBP was associated with a decreased risk of CVD (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.46-0.59). Subgroup analysis showed the significant associations were only observed in men (Pint = 0.0010). Similar patterns were observed for DBP variability and CVD subtypes. The results indicated that a large SBP variation in rise direction was associated with an increased risk of incident CVD, especially in men.
Related Concept Videos
Factors affecting Blood pressure
Physiological Factors:
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Assessing Blood pressure in the Leg
Preparation:
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.

