Microsurgical Treatment of Arteriovenous Malformations: A Single-Center Study Experience

The purpose of the study was to assess the functional outcomes after microsurgical resection of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and to compare the results between patients eligible for A Randomized Trial of Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformations in this surgical series to the results reported and the ARUBA study.

We reviewed the records of 169 patients who underwent microsurgical treatment of arteriovenous malformation (AVMs) in our institution between January 2016 and December 2021. These patients' functional status was assessed using modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at the last follow-up and before treatment. The mRS scores at the latest follow-up were classified into good outcomes (mRS < 3) and poor outcomes (mRS ≥ 3). Clinical presentation, patients' demographics, AVM characteristics, follow-up time, and obliteration rate were analyzed. Subgroup analyses were performed on the whole cohort, comparing Spetzler-Martin Grade I and Grade II, and ARUBA-eligible AVMs.

The initial hemorrhagic presentation occurred in 71 (42%) out of 169 patients. The majority of the patients presented with headaches (73%). The AVMs were completely obliterated in 166 (98.2%) patients. The series included 65 Spetzler-Martin Grade I (38.5%), 46 Grade II (27.2%), 32 Grade III (18.9%), 22 Grade IV (13%), and 4 Grade V (2.4%) AVMs. There were 98 unruptured and 79 ARUBA-eligible cases. Also, optimal functional outcome was achieved in 145 (85.8%) patients. The overall mortality rate was 5.3% (9/169). The multivariate analysis illustrated that a poor outcome was significantly associated with presurgical mRS ≥3 (p < 0.013; OR, 0.206; 95% CI 0.059-0.713), increasing age (p < 0.045; odds ratio [OR], 1.022; 95% CI 1.000-0.045), and female gender (p < 0.009; OR, 2.991; 95% CI 1.309-6.832).

Our study suggests that better outcomes can be obtained using microsurgical resection in the majority of patients with AVMs. Independent predictors of poor outcomes after surgical resection of AVMs include increasing age at the time of surgery, poor presurgical functional status, and female gender. Supposing that patients are more suitable for microsurgery after presurgical examination, outcomes are normally better in that case than those achieved by multimodal interventions (such as conservative treatment or ARUBA treatment arm). Therefore, we recommend early surgical removal on all surgically accessible AVMs to prevent successive hemorrhages and the consequences of poor neurological outcomes.