Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2025

Author Spotlight: Reprogramming Cancer Cells to iPSCs to Study Disease Progression and Treatment Targets
Published on: February 2, 2024
Combination Systemic Therapies in Advanced Well-Differentiated Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
Leonidas N Diamantopoulos1, Markos Kalligeros2, Thorvardur R Halfdanarson3
1Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Abstract:
There is an evolving landscape of systemic combination regimens for patients with advanced well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). In this review, we provide a comprehensive outline of the existing clinical trials/prospective studies investigating these combinations. PubMed was searched using key relevant terms to identify articles referring to GEP-NETs and combination treatments. No systematic search of the literature or metanalysis of the data was performed, and we focused on the most recent literature results. Primarily, phase 1 and 2 clinical trials were available, with a smaller number of phase 3 trials, reporting results from combination treatments across a wide range of antiproliferative agents. We identified significant variability in the anti-tumor activity of the reported combinations, with occasional promising results, but only a very small number of practice-changing phase 3 clinical trials. Overall, the peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT)-based combinations (with chemotherapy, dual PPRT, and targeted agents) and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent combinations with standard chemotherapy were found to have favorable results and may be worth investigating in future, larger-scale trials. In contrast, the immune-checkpoint inhibitor-based combinations were found to have limited applicability in advanced, well-differentiated GEP-NETs.
Insights
Systemic combination therapies for advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) show varied results. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and anti-VEGF combinations show promise, while immune checkpoint inhibitors have limited use.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Medical Research
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Advanced well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) require evolving systemic combination treatments.
- Current treatment strategies are under continuous investigation for improved efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review existing clinical trials and prospective studies on systemic combination regimens for advanced GEP-NETs.
- To outline the efficacy and applicability of various combination therapies.
Main Methods:
- A literature search was conducted on PubMed using relevant keywords for GEP-NETs and combination treatments.
- Focus was placed on recent literature, primarily Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials, with some Phase 3 data.
Main Results:
- Combination treatments demonstrated significant variability in anti-tumor activity.
- Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT)-based and anti-VEGF agent combinations showed favorable results.
- Immune-checkpoint inhibitor combinations exhibited limited applicability in advanced GEP-NETs.
Conclusions:
- PRRT-based and anti-VEGF combinations warrant further investigation in larger-scale trials for advanced GEP-NETs.
- Immune-checkpoint inhibitors are not currently recommended for this patient population based on available data.
Related Concept Videos
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment:

